Bug 62511 - Webpages which slow konquerer & X11 response down
Summary: Webpages which slow konquerer & X11 response down
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 53114
Alias: None
Product: konqueror
Classification: Applications
Component: khtml ecma (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Konqueror Developers
URL:
Keywords:
: 77956 79143 79463 80479 84871 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-08-11 23:54 UTC by M. Philippens
Modified: 2004-07-15 10:35 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description M. Philippens 2003-08-11 23:54:45 UTC
Version:           3.1.90 (using KDE 3.1.9)
Compiler:          gcc version 3.3 (SuSE Linux)
OS:          Linux (i686) release 2.4.21-4-default

When accessing www.chip.de the system becomes almost unusably slow, 
opening menus or bookmarks takes a lot of time ( seconds ), killing konqueror
is almost everytime the only solution.

www.marcooo.de has a similar problem, but the system is somewhat more
responsive.
Comment 1 Dik Takken 2003-08-15 19:21:00 UTC
Concerning chip.de: 
 
The slowdown is also present in the case of KDE 3.1.1, Redhat 7.2. It looks like the 
tickertape thing is causing the slowdown, because konqueror is redrawing the entire site 
10 times a second when the thing is running.  
 
As soon as javascript is turned off the tickertape stops and konqueror regains 
responsiveness. 
 
www.marcooo.de renders as a blanc page here. 
Comment 2 Stephan Kulow 2003-11-28 23:12:27 UTC
chip.de is just evil. Why don't they use flash or animated gifs or whatever
instead of taking the system down? ;(
Comment 3 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:24:24 UTC
*** Bug 77956 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:24:55 UTC
*** Bug 84871 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:27:11 UTC
*** Bug 80479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:27:47 UTC
*** Bug 79143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:28:52 UTC
*** Bug 79463 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:35:58 UTC
Duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 53114 ***