Bug 62511

Summary: Webpages which slow konquerer & X11 response down
Product: [Applications] konqueror Reporter: M. Philippens <marc_philippens>
Component: khtml ecmaAssignee: Konqueror Developers <konq-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal CC: cerebro84, cthulu, t.kleindienst, wonkothesane, wy2lam
Priority: NOR    
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:

Description M. Philippens 2003-08-11 23:54:45 UTC 
Version:           3.1.90 (using KDE 3.1.9)
Compiler:          gcc version 3.3 (SuSE Linux)
OS:          Linux (i686) release 2.4.21-4-default

When accessing www.chip.de the system becomes almost unusably slow, 
opening menus or bookmarks takes a lot of time ( seconds ), killing konqueror
is almost everytime the only solution.

www.marcooo.de has a similar problem, but the system is somewhat more
responsive.
Comment 1 Dik Takken 2003-08-15 19:21:00 UTC 
Concerning chip.de: 
 
The slowdown is also present in the case of KDE 3.1.1, Redhat 7.2. It looks like the 
tickertape thing is causing the slowdown, because konqueror is redrawing the entire site 
10 times a second when the thing is running.  
 
As soon as javascript is turned off the tickertape stops and konqueror regains 
responsiveness. 
 
www.marcooo.de renders as a blanc page here.
Comment 2 Stephan Kulow 2003-11-28 23:12:27 UTC 
chip.de is just evil. Why don't they use flash or animated gifs or whatever
instead of taking the system down? ;(
Comment 3 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:24:24 UTC 
*** Bug 77956 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:24:55 UTC 
*** Bug 84871 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:27:11 UTC 
*** Bug 80479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:27:47 UTC 
*** Bug 79143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:28:52 UTC 
*** Bug 79463 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Jo Øiongen 2004-07-15 10:35:58 UTC 
Duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 53114 ***