Bug 190888

Summary: error during software update
Product: [Unmaintained] kpackagekit Reporter: david.a.foote
Component: generalAssignee: Steven M. Parrish <smparrish>
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM    
Severity: normal CC: andresbajotierra, dantti12, dragonite_05, earrame, goucherg, gunn11, nathanprsn, smparrish, stoked37, tomek_matacz, troysims72
Priority: NOR    
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Debian stable   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Description david.a.foote 2009-04-28 01:10:48 UTC 
Version:            (using KDE 4.2.2)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Debian stable Packages

When attempting to update bug fixes through KDE control Manager, I received this error: "the backend took too much time to process the synchronous request-you need to fork!"  Have no idea what that means.  Just recently updated to the latest version of Kubuntu Jaunty Jackalope.
Comment 1 david.a.foote 2009-04-30 05:06:17 UTC 
This error occurs everytime I try to apply any updates through KDE Control Module.  System runs very slow since the update to the latest KDE version and I can't apply any further updates until this bug is somehow resolved.  I still don't know "forking" is from the error message.
Comment 2 david.a.foote 2009-05-05 04:13:06 UTC 
It appears that updates are installing; I'm just getting the error at the end of the update.
Comment 3 Dario Andres 2009-05-16 03:08:06 UTC 
YOu need to report this to Ubuntu as it is the packagekit implementation which is getting the error. KPackageKit only shows the error message.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
Thanks
Comment 4 Dario Andres 2009-05-23 15:07:50 UTC 
*** Bug 193746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Dario Andres 2009-06-24 23:54:36 UTC 
*** Bug 197783 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Dario Andres 2009-07-31 16:34:36 UTC 
*** Bug 202026 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Dario Andres 2009-07-31 16:34:52 UTC 
*** Bug 191104 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Dario Andres 2009-07-31 16:35:22 UTC 
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***
Comment 9 Tommi Tervo 2009-10-19 09:27:50 UTC 
*** Bug 203736 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Tommi Tervo 2009-10-19 09:28:28 UTC 
*** Bug 211037 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Jonathan Thomas 2009-10-26 21:51:40 UTC 
*** Bug 210671 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***