Bug 430891, Bug 430273, and Bug 430435 are all fixed in Frameworks 5.68--provided that you do a full re-index. However there is no mechanism to do that automatically, so people with Frameworks 5.78 are still experiencing these bugs. Then they file bug reports, and we tell them to do a `balooctl purge`, which helps. This should probably be done automatically.
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #0) > Bug 430891, Bug 430273, and Bug 430435 are all fixed in Frameworks > 5.68--provided that you do a full re-index. > > However there is no mechanism to do that automatically, so people with > Frameworks 5.78 are still experiencing these bugs. Then they file bug > reports, and we tell them to do a `balooctl purge`, which helps. This should > probably be done automatically. Perhaps on every version change that might affect baloo search. Though it would be best to prompt the user somehow as some may have large indexes that are already working and don't want a full re-index done which could take hours if they have a large collection of files.
*** Bug 431985 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 434000 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 438850 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 405317 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 405320 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Still run into this issue, cf: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438850#c12 Think it's worth flagging "Confirmed" Could perhaps make use of the "dbVersion" and bump it on a significant change.
Seemingly would catch people upgrading from Debian 10 to Debian 11 ... Frameworks 5.54 to 5.78
At this point everyone should be using 5.78 or later, and unfortunately it's pretty clear we're not going to action this. Closing.
(In reply to tagwerk19 from comment #7) > ... Could perhaps make use of the "dbVersion" and bump it on a significant change ... Cross reference: Bug 477068
*** Bug 439277 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I've directly referenced all bugs, which where referenced by "see also" via a marked duplicate of this bug.