Bug 392936 - "Shown" grouped images look identical to non-grouped images
Summary: "Shown" grouped images look identical to non-grouped images
Status: REPORTED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Albums-ItemGroup (show other bugs)
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows Microsoft Windows
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords: usability
: 426664 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-04-09 15:19 UTC by MarcP
Modified: 2022-01-10 08:06 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments
Screenshot, showing "shown" and "hidden" grouped images. (272.83 KB, image/png)
2018-04-09 15:19 UTC, MarcP
Details
Proposed improvement (shadow behind "shown" grouped images) (877.31 KB, image/png)
2018-04-09 15:37 UTC, MarcP
Details
More visible grouped image fro icon-view : link icon over thumbnails (196.10 KB, image/png)
2018-04-09 17:03 UTC, caulier.gilles
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description MarcP 2018-04-09 15:19:59 UTC
Created attachment 111921 [details]
Screenshot, showing "shown" and "hidden" grouped images.

This is a suggestion to improve the look of grouped images. 

Currently, grouped images, when "hidden" (right click "hide grouped images") appear as a stack of pictures. However, when "shown" (right click, "show grouped images"), they look identical as ungrouped pictures (see attachment), and there's no way to tell which of the next pictures are part of that group. Well, there's a number, but it's not very intuitive.

If there was some kind of background color/shadow that clearly indicated which pictures are part of a group, it would be visually more intuitive.
Comment 1 caulier.gilles 2018-04-09 15:29:09 UTC
Yes, but what do you propose in case of multiple group set in same album and all expanded. 

If we use a different color for each one, we will see a rainbow in icon-view. This will be not ergonomic.

Gilles Caulier
Comment 2 MarcP 2018-04-09 15:37:06 UTC
Created attachment 111922 [details]
Proposed improvement (shadow behind "shown" grouped images)
Comment 3 MarcP 2018-04-09 15:38:16 UTC
Something like this (see attachment 111922 [details]). There is no need to use different colors. Actually, I prefer a minimalist approach. Just drawing some kind of shadow behind the images belonging to a group would be enough to visually identify that they are part of the group, even when "shown".
Comment 4 caulier.gilles 2018-04-09 15:49:45 UTC
shadow behind "shown" grouped images ??? Where on your screenshot ? there is no visible difference for me...

Gilles Caulier
Comment 5 MarcP 2018-04-09 15:52:38 UTC
It's subtle. The background behind the two IMG_6321.JPG pictures in my screenshot is painted gray (second row, second and third pictures, I even added rounded corners!). This gray area could be shown only for "shown" grouped image groups.
Comment 6 caulier.gilles 2018-04-09 17:03:06 UTC
Created attachment 111927 [details]
More visible grouped image fro icon-view : link icon over thumbnails
Comment 7 caulier.gilles 2018-04-09 17:03:44 UTC
See my proposal : this indicate well the image grouped together with a link icon over thumbnails.
Comment 8 MarcP 2018-04-09 17:42:08 UTC
Not bad, but I'd prefer something more subtle. I'd leave my grouped pictures "shown" by default (since otherwise they don't appear in some searches), and that black chain can be a bit intrusive. I think the darker background could be enough, or maybe using a lighter color for the chain symbol.
Comment 9 caulier.gilles 2018-04-09 18:16:07 UTC
Note : your solution do not work if you apply Color label to images. This last one become hidden.

Gilles Caulier
Comment 10 MarcP 2018-04-09 18:19:49 UTC
Oh, ok. I have never personally used color labels.
Comment 11 caulier.gilles 2020-08-04 08:19:13 UTC
digiKam 7.0.0 stable release is now published:

https://www.digikam.org/news/2020-07-19-7.0.0_release_announcement/

We need a fresh feedback on this file using this version.

Best Regards

Gilles Caulier
Comment 12 MarcP 2020-08-04 09:30:34 UTC
Still present, but it's mostly a cosmetic issue, and not a very important one.
Comment 13 Maik Qualmann 2020-09-18 05:54:50 UTC
*** Bug 426664 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***