Bug 245874 - Spatial mode does not work
Summary: Spatial mode does not work
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 207309
Alias: None
Product: dolphin
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 16.12.2
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Frank Reininghaus
URL:
Keywords:
: 262569 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-07-27 10:01 UTC by Dotan Cohen
Modified: 2012-08-09 13:30 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dotan Cohen 2010-07-27 10:01:39 UTC 
Version:           unspecified (using KDE 4.4.4) 
OS:                Linux

Konqueror still opens new folders in the existing Konqueror window after "Open folders in separate windows" has been enabled.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Ilya Chernykh 2010-07-27 10:17:43 UTC 
This issue can be traced to the very beginning of KDE4, i.e. was not fixed for nearly 3 years.
Comment 2 Ilya Chernykh 2010-07-27 10:35:56 UTC 
I would say that it is a blocking feature for me as I always use spatial mode whereever on Gnome, Windows or KDE3.
Comment 3 Todd 2011-02-09 08:19:16 UTC 
*** Bug 262569 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Todd 2011-02-09 08:27:30 UTC 
This appears to actually be a dolphin bug, or rather a not implemented feature.  

The file konqueror.kcfg in the konqueror sources says at line 30:

     <entry key="AlwaysNewWin" type="Bool"> <!--TODO dolphinpart-->

Checking the konqueror source, this is definitely what the option in question sets, and checking my own config files shows that the option is set properly.  But there does not appear to be any reference to this option anywhere in the dolphin sources, which means the option can't do anything.

I've added Peter Penz to the CC since he appears to be the dolphin maintainer.  

I think this bug should be re-classified as a dolphin bug since that is how it is classified in the source code.
Comment 5 Jekyll Wu 2012-08-09 13:10:51 UTC 
duplicate of bug 207309 ?
Comment 6 Frank Reininghaus 2012-08-09 13:30:08 UTC 
I think you're right, thanks.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 207309 ***