Bug 229296 - Grammatical error in 'Korganizer confirmation dialogue' when dissociating events
Summary: Grammatical error in 'Korganizer confirmation dialogue' when dissociating events
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: korganizer
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Compiled Sources Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
: 229298 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-03-03 20:37 UTC by Sabine Faure
Modified: 2010-03-10 22:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sabine Faure 2010-03-03 20:37:17 UTC 
Version:            (using Devel)
Compiler:          gcc 4.3.2 
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Compiled sources

- Launch KOrg
- Click on 'New Event' and create a weekly recurring event
- In the agenda view right click on the recurring event and select 'Dissociate from recurrence...'
- A 'KOrganizer Confirmation' dialogue appears with the following message: 'Do you want to dissociate the occurrence at Day Date Month Year from the recurrence or also dissociate future ones?

Grammaticaly, it would be better to say 'Do you want to dissociate the occurence ON Day Date Month Year from the recurrence or also dissociate future ones?'

Trunk, Svn Rev 1098377
Comment 1 Sergio Martins 2010-03-04 02:11:59 UTC 
*** Bug 229298 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Laurent Montel 2010-03-04 11:12:56 UTC 
SVN commit 1098773 by mlaurent:

Fix bug 229296
CCBUG: 229296


 M  +1 -1      calendarview.cpp  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1098773
Comment 3 Laurent Montel 2010-03-04 11:13:23 UTC 
Fixed in svn #1098773.
Comment 4 David Faure 2010-03-04 20:35:44 UTC 
SVN commit 1098961 by dfaure:

Fix at->on in the other location where it appears.
CCBUG: 229296


 M  +1 -1      calendarview.cpp  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1098961
Comment 5 Sabine Faure 2010-03-10 22:44:38 UTC 
It is corrected now.

The message is now correct grammatically.

Trunk, Svn Rev 1101692