Bug 226136 - KDE 4.4 eating up more RAM than 4.3
Summary: KDE 4.4 eating up more RAM than 4.3
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 190519
Alias: None
Product: kde
Classification: I don't know
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Arch Linux Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unassigned bugs mailing-list
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-02-10 14:12 UTC by Eugene Markow
Modified: 2011-05-27 20:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Eugene Markow 2010-02-10 14:12:51 UTC
Version:            (using KDE 4.4.0)
Compiler:          gcc 4.4.3 The GNU Compiler Collection
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Archlinux Packages

Given the SAME settings on both versions and after numeous testing, upon bootup, KDE 4.4 is eating up *slightly* more RAM than KDE 4.3, at least 25 MB more on the average. Ok, this is small, however, it could eventually add up if the trend continues. This is the first time I've noticed a RAM increase in a while between version changes. I realize the developers mentioned they fixed numerous bugs from the previous version, but shouldn't they be working on getting it lighter? Where's the most likely culprit for this additional RAM usage? Can it be attributed to the newer QT version 4.6.1, or something else? On both versions of KDE (4.4 & 4.3), I had Nepomuk Semantic Desktop and Strigi Desktop File Indexer disabled. It would be nice to see a downward trend in RAM usage in future releases of KDE. Thanks.
Comment 1 Dario Andres 2010-02-10 16:22:14 UTC
For KDE 4.5, Plasma Workspaces team is going to have a conservative release, fixing bugs, without introducing too much new features. I think there is a tendency to achieve this on the whole KDE SC....
Comment 2 Andreas Pakulat 2010-02-10 16:38:57 UTC
Basically this bugreport is useless. What would be needed as bare minimum to make this useful is:

1. A description of your measurement methods
2. along with 1. which processes did you monitor to come to your numbers
3. Is there anything else that changed on the system

Saying "KDE uses 25M more memory" is simply not saying anything, except that you don't like something. There's no "KDE" that could take up memory, there are tons of processes and depending on the actual process 25M more might be close to nothing or a double in size.
Comment 3 disabled account 2011-05-27 20:59:17 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 190519 ***