Bug 204750 - Disconntected IMAP gets incoming mails only on explicit request, and then with a delay
Summary: Disconntected IMAP gets incoming mails only on explicit request, and then wit...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 185411
Alias: None
Product: kmail
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Gentoo Packages Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-22 11:20 UTC by Nico Schlömer
Modified: 2010-03-05 09:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nico Schlömer 2009-08-22 11:20:04 UTC
Version:            (using KDE 4.3.0)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Gentoo Packages

Hi,

I recently switched to using dIMAP on Kmail with my Gmail account, and it work sort of alright in the sense that it doesn't lose mail and such nasty things.

The experience could be a lot better for me, though, as

1.) incoming mails are not automatically fetched. When doing an explicit sync, they will appear of course.

There are quite a few folders I have in the account, and all of them are synced when doing the explicit sync of course. "Inbox" is merely one of them, so when clicking the button it will easily take two minutes or so until the folder "Inbox" in synced, which is quite annoying.

2.) It'd be great if it was possible to sync inbox only, or to make sure it gets synced first at least.

Cheers,
Nico
Comment 1 Björn Ruberg 2010-03-05 00:28:17 UTC
Please just report one issue per bug.
I didn't understand your 1). Have you marked the mail accounts to be automatically fetched all - say - 2 minutes?
2) Is a which already reported
Comment 2 Nico Schlömer 2010-03-05 01:54:34 UTC
Hi,

thanks for the comment.

This bug is rather old, and I don't know if it still applies at all: I'm not using Kmail anymore.

How do we mark the bug?

--Nico
Comment 3 Björn Ruberg 2010-03-05 09:52:25 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 185411 ***