Version: (using KDE KDE 3.5.3) Installed from: Gentoo Packages Compiler: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 (Gentoo Hardened 3.4.6-r1, ssp-3.4.5-1.0, pie-8.7.9) OS: Linux I created a new folder on dimap account. After moving some mails into this new folder and clicking "Check Mail" icon, kmail (in fact kontact) crashes. Backtrace: Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". `system-supplied DSO at 0xffffe000' has disappeared; keeping its symbols. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1243859280 (LWP 11637)] [New Thread -1284494432 (LWP 12481)] [New Thread -1276101728 (LWP 12480)] [New Thread -1267709024 (LWP 12479)] [New Thread -1259316320 (LWP 12478)] [KCrash handler] #6 0x0065642e in ?? () #7 0xb533f9c4 in KMFolderImap::flagsToStatus () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkmailprivate.so #8 0xb55ac4a1 in KMFolderCachedImap::slotGetMessagesData () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkmailprivate.so #9 0xb55b2bc6 in KMFolderCachedImap::qt_invoke () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkmailprivate.so #10 0xb6602018 in QObject::activate_signal (this=0x8ce9f70, clist=0x8a10a18, o=0xbfbc34b0) at kernel/qobject.cpp:2356 #11 0xb73aaa19 in KIO::TransferJob::data () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkio.so.4 #12 0xb73aaa88 in KIO::TransferJob::slotData () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkio.so.4 #13 0xb73d5e9c in KIO::TransferJob::qt_invoke () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkio.so.4 #14 0xb6602018 in QObject::activate_signal (this=0x8a067f0, clist=0x89a24e0, o=0xbfbc35e0) at kernel/qobject.cpp:2356 #15 0xb73a6d2d in KIO::SlaveInterface::data () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkio.so.4 #16 0xb73f69ad in KIO::SlaveInterface::dispatch () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkio.so.4 #17 0xb73d3cc3 in KIO::SlaveInterface::dispatch () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkio.so.4 #18 0xb73ca23b in KIO::Slave::gotInput () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkio.so.4 #19 0xb73d1f68 in KIO::Slave::qt_invoke () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkio.so.4 #20 0xb6602018 in QObject::activate_signal (this=0x8994a28, clist=0x8a06a58, o=0xbfbc3a60) at kernel/qobject.cpp:2356 #21 0xb66023b5 in QObject::activate_signal (this=0x8994a28, signal=2, param=50) at kernel/qobject.cpp:2449 #22 0xb69eba37 in QSocketNotifier::activated (this=0x8994a28, t0=50) at .moc/debug-shared-mt/moc_qsocketnotifier.cpp:85 #23 0xb6627513 in QSocketNotifier::event (this=0x8994a28, e=0xbfbc3dc0) at kernel/qsocketnotifier.cpp:258 #24 0xb6590e31 in QApplication::internalNotify (this=0xbfbc4040, receiver=0x8994a28, e=0xbfbc3dc0) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:2635 #25 0xb6590080 in QApplication::notify (this=0xbfbc4040, receiver=0x8994a28, e=0xbfbc3dc0) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:2358 #26 0xb6ec0616 in KApplication::notify () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #27 0xb65166c8 in QApplication::sendEvent (receiver=0x8994a28, event=0xbfbc3dc0) at qapplication.h:496 #28 0xb657c568 in QEventLoop::activateSocketNotifiers (this=0x8173ef0) at kernel/qeventloop_unix.cpp:578 #29 0xb652c0f9 in QEventLoop::processEvents (this=0x8173ef0, flags=4) at kernel/qeventloop_x11.cpp:383 #30 0xb65a8ce5 in QEventLoop::enterLoop (this=0x8173ef0) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:198 #31 0xb65a8c00 in QEventLoop::exec (this=0x8173ef0) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:145 #32 0xb6590fc5 in QApplication::exec (this=0xbfbc4040) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:2758 #33 0x08060ef5 in main ()
Isn't this bug of my bug 127863?
Yes, I think you're right. I'm wondering, why I missed that during my bug search... How to flag this one as a duplicate?
I can mark it duplicate, thanks. The reason you didn't come across that bug is, attached backtraces cannot be searched into, they need to be pasted. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 127863 ***