Summary: | No Xinerama support for the screensavers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [I don't know] kde | Reporter: | Felix Seeger <seeger> |
Component: | xinerama | Assignee: | George Staikos <staikos> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Compiled Sources | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Felix Seeger
2002-07-16 08:45:50 UTC
I don't know.... it looks OK to me. What exactly do you want? Two copies of the screensaver running, one on each head? I think that one big screensaver is suitable. They seem to work for me. Subject: Re: No Xinerama support for the screensavers As I wrote in the report some screensavers only blank the first screen. But maybe that is not kdes fault. A slideshow simply looks ugly if you don't have 2 TFTs with small or nearly none borders. Maybe you can display to images, on on the first one on the second. You can also switch between the displays. The first on the first screen, second on second screen third on the first again... Maybe blank the second screen for screensavers that don't support both in a nice looking way. thanks have fun Felix Subject: Re: No Xinerama support for the screensavers Please give an example of a screensaver in 3.1.0 or CVS which does this, because I couldn't find one. On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:10, you wrote: > As I wrote in the report some screensavers only blank the first screen. But > maybe that is not kdes fault. > > A slideshow simply looks ugly if you don't have 2 TFTs with small or nearly > none borders. > Maybe you can display to images, on on the first one on the second. > You can also switch between the displays. The first on the first screen, > second on second screen third on the first again... > > Maybe blank the second screen for screensavers that don't support both in a > nice looking way. |