| Summary: | Wrap lines in Table of Contents panel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] okular | Reporter: | Ruslan Kabatsayev <b7.10110111> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Okular developers <okular-devel> |
| Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | aacid, harrisonts, kde, mikimouse1188, mzainulalimam, pieterkristensen, postix |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://i0.simplest-image-hosting.net/picture/adober9vsokular.png | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Ruslan Kabatsayev
2013-07-17 16:46:42 UTC
Can you please attach such a document? Well can't attach since it's too big. Here's the link: http://www.atmel.com/Images/doc2466.pdf To be honest i think that the fact the tooltip is there is enough already but if someone shows up with a patch we can discuss about it. I was looking if a bug existed on this subject, and it did! Now that Okular gets all kind of fixes, it would be great if this would be implantated too. The pdf-reader Firefox has wraps the lines in the "table of contents panel" in such an elegant way! In my opinion this is the one thing Okular still needs. I would like to see this is Okular as well, or at least the option to scroll the pane horizontally. Without either of those I am constantly resizing the pane just to see the full names of content. It would seem that both Firefox and Chrome wrap lines. *** Bug 345083 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 439223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I don't quit understand: In bug https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439223 - mentioned above as "duplicate of" - anyway in this bug in comment 2 there is a link to https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/449 . This "merge requiest 449" ends with a list of 80 commits done one month ago. This looks very promising to me. Shouldn't this be mentioned here? (In reply to PK from comment #8) > I don't quit understand: > In bug https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439223 - mentioned above as > "duplicate of" - anyway in this bug in comment 2 there is a link to > https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/449 . > This "merge requiest 449" ends with a list of 80 commits done one month ago. > > This looks very promising to me. > Shouldn't this be mentioned here? There is a open MR, yes. I don't know the state of it; but reviewers and testers always welcome. |
