Version: 0.7.2 (using KDE 3.4.0 Level "b" , SUSE 9.3) Compiler: gcc version 3.3.5 20050117 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.11.4-21.7-default It would be nice to have the possibility to filter images using a filter-textbox like for example in amaroks collection tree view. The Filtering mechanism should use Keywords and comments.
Should this proposed "filter-textbox" for images with a certain keyword/comment in terms of functionality be the same as a quick search? (Depending on how http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149555 is realized, this could also solve this wish).
Yes. IMO we should get rid of quick search as additional dialog. ---------------------------------------------------- Dwa razy m
Currently search has not a good usability IMO. I would like to have: - in the left Search sidebar a simple lineedit to create a simple search (tags, comments) - a button to create an advanced search - advanced search not as a dialog, more like this: http://www.google.com/advanced_search - perhaps an additional lineedit in the main view like this bug report here wishes.
Marcel, This vision is perfect for me... Gilles
> - advanced search not as a dialog, more like this: Dialog -NOT MODAL - has its uses. Eg. you can check seme details while constructing complex queries.
yes Mikolaj this is true. Perhaps the advanced search can be put in an extra not-modal window. Or in the central pane, but then you cannot check for details or look at other searches.
SVN commit 738271 by cgilles: digiKam from KDE3 branch : new text filter on status bar to filter current album contents based on item name, comments and tags strings. CCMAIL: digikam-devel@kde.org BUG: 110136 CCBUGS: 139283 CCBUGS: 133191 M +1 -1 albumiconview.cpp M +37 -9 albumlister.cpp M +3 -1 albumlister.h M +14 -0 albumsettings.cpp M +3 -0 albumsettings.h M +21 -0 digikamapp.cpp M +1 -0 digikamapp.h M +4 -0 digikamappprivate.h WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=738271
Well, this bug was specifically about filtering album tree, not album contents :) But with this implemented it would only give confusion to users and filtering of album content is more important.
SVN commit 741527 by cgilles: digiKam from KDE3 branch : new text filters have been added to the bottom of left and right sidebars. View listed below can be filtered: - Album folder view. - Tags folder view. - Search folder view - Tags Filter folder view. When user type a string, a search is performed to tree view contents and only items including the strings are displayed. A screenshot of digiKam in action is available at this url: http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/Screenshots/digikam0.9.3-searchfolderbar.png BUG: 133191 BUG: 146364 CCBUGS: 110136 CCMAIL: digikam-devel@kde.org M +69 -1 albumfolderview.cpp M +5 -0 albumfolderview.h M +86 -11 digikamview.cpp M +34 -1 searchfolderview.cpp M +9 -0 searchfolderview.h M +68 -0 tagfilterview.cpp M +5 -0 tagfilterview.h M +68 -0 tagfolderview.cpp M +5 -0 tagfolderview.h WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=741527
SVN commit 741717 by cgilles: backport commits #741527 from KDE3 branch: new text filters have been added to the bottom of left and right sidebars. View listed below can be filtered: - Album folder view. - Tags folder view. - Search folder view - Tags Filter folder view. When user type a string, a search is performed to tree view contents and only items including the strings are displayed. A screenshot of digiKam in action is available at this url: http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/Screenshots/digikam0.9.3-searchfolderbar.png CCBUGS: 133191 CCBUGS: 146364 CCBUGS: 110136 CCMAIL: digikam-devel@kde.org M +69 -0 albumfolderview.cpp M +7 -1 albumfolderview.h M +85 -12 digikamview.cpp M +33 -0 searchfolderview.cpp M +10 -1 searchfolderview.h M +68 -0 tagfilterview.cpp M +5 -0 tagfilterview.h M +68 -0 tagfolderview.cpp M +5 -0 tagfolderview.h WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=741717
Gilles, wonderful. That's exactly the feature that I was missing. It's really great. I have tested it and seems to work fine. Thank you ;-).
Works really great :) Many thanks.
Thanks Mik. The next big improvement planed for 0.9.4 is this one: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96388 Comments are welcome of course Gilles
> CCBUGS: 133191 > CCBUGS: 146364 > CCBUGS: 110136 Everything is backported and no more (negative) comments. May I close these entries?
Mik, All is backport for "BUG" tagged files. I have tagged as "CCBUGS" others files because these are not fully implemented with this commit. So don't close these files yet... Gilles