Version: (using KDE Devel) Installed from: Compiled sources According to http://www.icefox.net/kde/tests/copyright_kdebase.html there are a number of konsole files without copyrights. No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/BlockArray.cpp Nothing at all. No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/konsole_wcwidth.cpp A note saying it is in public domain. No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/konsolebookmarkhandler.cpp Nothing. No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/konsolebookmarkmenu.cpp Nothing. No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/kwrited.cpp Nothing.
> No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/BlockArray.cpp > Nothing at all. Stephan Kulow added it. > No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/konsole_wcwidth.cpp > A note saying it is in public domain. That's ok. > No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/konsolebookmarkhandler.cpp > Nothing. > No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/konsolebookmarkmenu.cpp > Nothing. Added by Stephan Binner > No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/kwrited.cpp > Nothing. Added by Lars Doelle
Am Monday 14 February 2005 11:09 schrieb Waldo Bastian: > > No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/BlockArray.cpp > > Nothing at all. > > Stephan Kulow added it. > But it was never used, no? Greetings, Stephan
On Monday 14 February 2005 11:45, Stephan Kulow wrote: > Am Monday 14 February 2005 11:09 schrieb Waldo Bastian: > > > No Copyright found in: ./konsole/konsole/BlockArray.cpp > > > Nothing at all. > > > > Stephan Kulow added it. > > But it was never used, no? TEHistory.cpp uses it.
http://developer.kde.org/policies/licensepolicy.html I notice it doesn't say anything about 'public domain'. Is that an oversight?
No Copyright found in: ./kicker/menuext/konsole/konsolebookmarkhandler.cpp No Copyright found in: ./kicker/menuext/konsole/konsolebookmarkmenu.cpp Added by Stephan Binner
http://www.englishbreakfastnetwork.org/krazy/reports/kde-4.0/kdebase/apps/index.html # ./konsole/tests/esc.c: missing tags: copyright (1) # ./konsole/tests/main.c: missing tags: copyright (1) # ./konsole/tests/header.h: missing tags: copyright (1) # ./konsole/konsole/konsole_part.h: missing tags: email address(line 3) (1) # ./konsole/konsole/konsoleiface.h: missing tags: copyright (1) # ./konsole/konsole/sessioniface.h: missing tags: copyright (1) # ./konsole/konsole/konsole_part.cpp: missing tags: email address(line 3) (1) # ./konsole/tests/esc.c: missing license # ./konsole/tests/main.c: missing license # ./konsole/tests/header.h: missing license # ./konsole/konsole/konsoleiface.h: missing license # ./konsole/konsole/sessioniface.h: missing license The test/ files use (c) instead of 'copyright'; They are pre-GPL and I'm not sure that's O.K. I'm trying to get an answer from license ml. The *iface.h will be removed when DCOP is dropped. The konsole_part.h/.cpp files I'm trying to find an up todate email address for Boloni Laszlo ( blaci@utcluj.ro, boloni@cs.purdue.edu bounced).
# ./konsole/tests/esc.c: missing license # ./konsole/tests/main.c: missing license # ./konsole/tests/header.h: missing license # ./konsole/tests/esc.c: missing tags: copyright (1) # ./konsole/tests/main.c: missing tags: copyright (1) # ./konsole/tests/header.h: missing tags: copyright (1) I'm still waiting for someone to say whether these files in /tests are O.K. as is... the license ml seems dead... http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-licensing&m=115260953008961&w=2
According to krazy, konsole passes all the copyright/license tests...