Bug 98080 - Several more recent CUPS printjob options are not supported by KDEPrint's GUI
Summary: Several more recent CUPS printjob options are not supported by KDEPrint's GUI
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 98081
Alias: None
Product: kdeprint
Classification: Unmaintained
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Compiled Sources Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Goffioul
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-01-28 16:20 UTC by Kurt Pfeifle
Modified: 2008-12-31 17:59 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kurt Pfeifle 2005-01-28 16:20:52 UTC
Version:            (using KDE Devel)
Installed from:    Compiled sources
OS:                Linux

Here is a (incomplete) list of CUPS print job options (introduced in more recent versions) which are not yet supported by the kprinter GUI, with examples for values to use:

 +------------------+--------------+ 
 | number-up        |       6|9|16 | # 16 pages on 1 sheet 
 +------------------+--------------+ 
 | number-up-layout | [btrl| +more | # fr. bottom to top, fr. right to left 
 +------------------+--------------+ 
 | mirror           | true         | # print output mirrored 
 +------------------+--------------+ 
 | page-border      | double-thick | # draw two 1pt borders around each page 
 +------------------+--------------+ 
 | raw              | true         | # print raw (override all other options) 
 +------------------+--------------+ 
 


[These options are currently not even supported by means of the "Additonal Tags" tab widget, since options added there get prefixed with a "KDEPrint-" string, while CUPS filters expect them without that prefix.]

This wishlist/bug item is meant as a reminder for post-3.4 work on KDEPrint. It may not be complete. It is just what I can think of now without chacking the CUPS documentation.
Comment 1 Kurt Pfeifle 2005-01-28 16:22:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 98081 ***
Comment 2 John Layt 2008-12-31 17:59:31 UTC
Closing old Resolved status bug.