Bug 87423 - [test case] Cells squashing in tables
Summary: [test case] Cells squashing in tables
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 77288
Alias: None
Product: konqueror
Classification: Applications
Component: khtml (other bugs)
Version First Reported In: unspecified
Platform: Compiled Sources Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Konqueror Bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-18 13:18 UTC by Jenya
Modified: 2004-11-22 17:03 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments
test case (137 bytes, text/html)
2004-11-22 15:11 UTC, Jenya
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jenya 2004-08-18 13:18:46 UTC
Version:            (using KDE Devel)
Installed from:    Compiled sources
Compiler:          gcc 
OS:                Linux

At groklaw.net and some other sites for indenting rows with nested messages used following method:
<tr> 
 <td width="25">blah</td> 
 <td width="100%">blah</td> 
</tr> 

But khtml since sometimes of mid of kde 3.2 development (november-december) started to squash left cell leaving the rows unindented.
Comment 1 Stephan Kulow 2004-11-12 14:24:00 UTC
please do a self containing test case. I don't recognize a problem on groklaw.net/
Comment 2 Jenya 2004-11-22 15:11:29 UTC
Created attachment 8367 [details]
test case 

still doesn't work with latest cvs
Comment 3 Jenya 2004-11-22 15:16:33 UTC
Still doesn't work with fresh cvs.
At groklaw.net problem is seen when you are browsing article in nested mode: messages instead of being threaded are flat.

Test case is added: http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=8367&action=view
Comment 4 Stephan Kulow 2004-11-22 15:48:45 UTC
hmm, what cvs? It works perfectly fine (one tiny orange and one large gray box) with HEAD
Comment 5 Stephan Kulow 2004-11-22 16:03:51 UTC
Hmm, Allan confirmed? Now I'm puzzled
Comment 6 Allan Sandfeld 2004-11-22 16:21:51 UTC
The first cell in the test case should be 115px and the second should take a 100% of _the rest_. It doesnt look like that is happening
Comment 7 Allan Sandfeld 2004-11-22 16:23:55 UTC
Actually it the same error as case D in #77288

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 77288 ***
Comment 8 Stephan Kulow 2004-11-22 16:34:58 UTC
the thing is it renders exactly as in firefox
Comment 9 Allan Sandfeld 2004-11-22 17:02:59 UTC
You are right. I hadn't tested it. It needs two addition to show the same bug as 77288, table-layout:fixed and a fixed table width.

This bug-report is more likely fixed or invalid.