Bug 86592 - WISH: Status bar at bottom of default splash screen unneccessary, consider removing
Summary: WISH: Status bar at bottom of default splash screen unneccessary, consider re...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 86441
Alias: None
Product: ksplash
Classification: Plasma
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Debian testing Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ravikiran Rajagopal
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-04 21:15 UTC by Danny Allen
Modified: 2004-08-06 16:52 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments
Current splash behaviour (181.38 KB, image/png)
2004-08-04 21:44 UTC, Danny Allen
Details
Proposed behaviour (166.45 KB, image/png)
2004-08-04 21:45 UTC, Danny Allen
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Danny Allen 2004-08-04 21:15:00 UTC
Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.2.3)
Installed from:    Debian testing/unstable Packages

I think that having the progress bar and status at the bottom of the standard splash screen is unneccessary, as the text is always the same and not really that informative. Also, the brogress bar does not fit the bottom status bar properly anyway - this looks amateur and silly.

The solution to this is to remove the status bar completely - this can be done easily, and will not break compatability with existing themes. This will look better, and the user will still be informed by the flashing icons of the default splash.

Please consider this proposal.

Thanks,
Danny
Comment 1 Danny Allen 2004-08-04 21:44:05 UTC
Created attachment 7001 [details]
Current splash behaviour
Comment 2 Danny Allen 2004-08-04 21:45:30 UTC
Created attachment 7002 [details]
Proposed behaviour
Comment 3 Danny Allen 2004-08-04 21:46:57 UTC
Forgot one last point of my proposed implementation: when the bottom bar is hidden, the colour of the bar is taken, and used to add the bottom 1-pixel border. This way, no difference can be noticed.
Comment 4 Lubos Lunak 2004-08-06 16:52:19 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 86441 ***