Bug 84895 - Feature request: remove attachments from IMAP eMail message
Summary: Feature request: remove attachments from IMAP eMail message
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 17513
Alias: None
Product: kmail
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Unlisted Binaries Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-07-11 04:32 UTC by Simon Bock
Modified: 2007-09-14 12:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Simon Bock 2004-07-11 04:32:31 UTC
Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.2.1)
Installed from:    Unspecified Linux
OS:                Linux

It saves a lot of hassle if you can store your eMail archive on an IMAP server.
Storage space there is limited, and most of the times it is the eMail text that is valuable for you to store (accessible via IMAP on a server), not the attachment (that you downloaded for local use).

Here a feature that Outlook Express supports comes in very handy: you can delete attachments selectively from eMail messages.
This I do miss in kmail.
I I get - for example - a program archive sent via eMail, with attached information on its usage in the mail text, I intend to keep this information on the IMAP server to be able to search for it using authors name, subject or recipients. The attachment itelf I cannot use via eMail, I download it and would now be very happy to delete it in the eMail text that I intend to store. (so to say, move the attachment to the local disk)

Unfortunately kmail does not allow me to do that - this is one of the very few things I need to boot up Windows with Outlook express in my vmware for.
I hope you are able to include this feature to kmail, too.

(It seems to me that this feature might be tricky to implement since IMAP might not support a command for selective attachment deletion. But somehow Outlook manages to achieve this, as well...)

Thanks!
Comment 1 Carsten Burghardt 2004-07-11 11:25:32 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17513 ***