Bug 84620 - No Internet Connections can be established whatsoever
Summary: No Internet Connections can be established whatsoever
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: kppp
Classification: Unmaintained
Component: general (other bugs)
Version First Reported In: unspecified
Platform: RedHat Enterprise Linux Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Harri Porten
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-07-07 06:49 UTC by Doryforos
Modified: 2023-01-07 05:22 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Doryforos 2004-07-07 06:49:44 UTC
Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.2.3)
Installed from:    RedHat RPMs
OS:                Linux

After upgrading to v3.2.3 under Fedora Core 2, when initiating a connection with kppp, everything seems to be working fine, the connection icon docs in the system tray, but I cannot connect to any server, either http or ftp; I cannot ping any hosts either.

Here is a typical output I get, when running kppp via a command in a terminal:

[user@localhost user]$ kppp
Opener: received SetSecret
Opener: received OpenLock

Opener: received OpenDevice
QMetaObject::findSignal:Accounting: Conflict with
AccountingBase::changed(QString,QString)
Opener: received ExecPPPDaemon
In parent: pppd pid 3161
Opener: received OpenResolv
Couldn"t find interface ppp0: No such device
Kernel supports ppp alright.
Opener: received RemoveSecret
Opener: received RemoveSecret
Opener: received KillPPPDaemon
In killpppd(): Sending SIGTERM to 3161
Opener: received RemoveSecret
Opener: received RemoveSecret
Opener: received OpenResolv
Opener: received OpenResolv
Opener: received RemoveLock
It was pppd that died
pppd exited with return value 5
Sending 3157 a SIGUSR1

My hardware is the NetMod ISDN terminal, USB version; more information on this device can be found at
http://netmod.intracom.gr/
Comment 1 Waldo Bastian 2004-07-07 11:52:05 UTC
Assigning to kppp but I doubt this has anything to do with KDE, seems to be a pppd/modem driver issue.
Comment 2 Harri Porten 2004-07-07 11:55:26 UTC
Have you tried pinging a host by its IP, eg. 80.232.38.13?

What does /sbin/ifconfig show?
Comment 3 Doryforos 2004-07-07 16:25:14 UTC
> Assigning to kppp but I doubt this has anything to do with KDE, seems to be a pppd/modem driver issue.

I did not change anything, but KDE.

I access NetMod using ACM (USB Abstract Control Model driver for USB modems and ISDN adapters), having created this device file as instructed in NetMod's Linux configuration guide:

[root@localhost root]# mknod /dev/usb/ttyACM0 c 166 0
[root@localhost root]# mknod /dev/usb/ttyACM1 c 166 0
[root@localhost root]# ...

Things worked smoothly up to KDE-3.2.2 (inclusive).

----------

> Have you tried pinging a host by its IP

Yes, both hostnames and IP addresses tried -- no results.

> What does /sbin/ifconfig show?

[user@localhost user]$ less /sbin/ifconfig
"/sbin/ifconfig" may be a binary file.  See it anyway? [answered "no" here]
[user@localhost user]$ ll /sbin/ifconfig
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 55204 2004-06-03 13:03 /sbin/ifconfig*
Comment 4 Doryforos 2004-07-07 16:28:35 UTC
> Things worked smoothly up to KDE-3.2.2 (inclusive).

Additionally, after downgrading to KDE-3.2.2 (using what is on the Fedora Core 2 distribution ISO's), connections work fine again.
Comment 5 Harri Porten 2004-07-08 14:02:32 UTC
Re ifconfig: please *execute* /sbin/ifconfig while you are connected and send the output.

The fact that switching the KDE RPMS reproduces the problem doesn't rule out a problem introduced by the distributor rather than KDE. Can you compile kppp from sources?
Comment 6 Doryforos 2004-07-08 23:40:42 UTC
[user@localhost user]$ /sbin/ifconfig
lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:2673 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2673 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:1473458 (1.4 Mb)  TX bytes:1473458 (1.4 Mb)

ppp0      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
          inet addr:213.16.146.28  P-t-P:194.219.252.157  Mask:255.255.255.255
          UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:8 errors:2 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:3
          RX bytes:232 (232.0 b)  TX bytes:362 (362.0 b)

Compile kppp from sources? Well, first of all, kppp itself appears to be working alright; anyway -- as I understand it -- kppp, being part of kdenetwork, would require compiling this package from sources, which would in turn require to compile the whole bunch of KDE packages, a process through which I have neither the time, nor the disk space required to go, not to mention the lack of guarantee for success...
Comment 7 Harri Porten 2004-07-09 08:27:47 UTC
The PPP interface is there at least so kppp's job is done. What's remaining
seems like a network setup issue like e.g. a firewall. Without you spending
some time on compiling an older kppp version it will impossible to pin down potential reasons for a regression from here.
Comment 8 Doryforos 2004-07-09 19:30:53 UTC
No network setup issues... It's just a standalone PC, using iptables, which worked fine with KDE-3.2.2; I also stopped the iptables daemon, but to no avail.

How do I do the compilation?
How do I handle package management issues, after installing without using RPM?

(you may e-mail me directly)
Comment 9 Harri Porten 2004-07-09 20:13:13 UTC
You could download ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/3.2.2/src/kdenetwork-3.2.2.tar.bz2

tar xvfj kdenetwork-3.2.2.tar.bz2
cd kdenetwork-3.2.2
./configure
make

and you should end up with the old kppp version as kppp/kppp. No need to permanently install it. Just try if it works better than the new one from the RPM.
Comment 10 Doryforos 2004-07-09 23:59:57 UTC
Do I have to download and compile? (Isn't enough just to use the binary from KDE 3.2.2 -- just extract it from the RPM, using MC?)
What about any garbage left on my system? (How do I clean up afterwards?)
Do I have to be root? (kppp is a symbolic link to consolehelper in RedHat 9.0/Fedora Core).
Comment 11 Harri Porten 2004-07-11 08:14:30 UTC
Sure. As it's easier you might do this as a first step (compiling will be needed
only if we'll have to identify a single patch that is causing your problems).

What garbage do you mean? All you need to extract is the (real) kppp binary
and temporary replace it (make a backup copy of the old one). You'll have to follow the kppp symlink to find out what it is pointing to and where the real kppp binary is located and how it is named. RH's consolehelper has already been the cause of many problems. Don't remember how the setup concretely is.
Comment 12 Doryforos 2004-07-14 10:33:33 UTC
I'm posting this from FC2, using (the original) kppp from kdenetwork that came with FC2 ISO's, extracted from the .RPM as described above.

I wanted to wait until I install the new ppp FC2 upgrade (as it conflicted with initscripts, but no update to that was posted until today).

kppp from KDE-3.2.3 still doesn't work, though, with the updated ppp (ppp-2.4.2-3.FC2.1.rpm).

What's very odd is that somehow the executables' sizes change from their original on my system, for no apparent reason.

When the packages are installed, their sizes are as follows:
[root@localhost sbin]# ll kppp*
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 547088 2004-04-14 18:26 kppp (3.2.2)
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 547152 2004-06-03 22:40 kppp (3.2.3)

After some usage, their sizes become as follows:
[root@localhost sbin]# ll kppp*
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 657416 2004-04-14 18:26 kppp (3.2.2)
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 652972 2004-06-03 22:40 kppp (3.2.3)

> What garbage do you mean?

After compiling (if/when I do it). Does anything get written on my system, elsewhere than where the tarfile is extracted, and the compilation is performed? (both are presumably the same folder)

> ... follow the kppp symlink ...

I'm already employing the "quick and dirty solution" described at
http://devel-home.kde.org/~kppp/faq.html
Comment 13 Harri Porten 2004-07-14 14:29:45 UTC
On 14 Jul 2004, Doryforos wrote:

> I'm posting this from FC2, using (the original) kppp from kdenetwork
> that came with FC2 ISO's, extracted from the .RPM as described above.

OK. I looked through the list of changes between 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 but can't
see any change obviously being responsible.

> I wanted to wait until I install the new ppp FC2 upgrade (as it
> conflicted with initscripts, but no update to that was posted until
> today).
>
> kppp from KDE-3.2.3 still doesn't work, though, with the updated ppp
> (ppp-2.4.2-3.FC2.1.rpm).
>
> What's very odd is that somehow the executables' sizes change from their
> original on my system, for no apparent reason.

That's really strange. Do you have a corrupted file system maybe? You
could check this by running 'fsck' on your partition(s).

> > What garbage do you mean?
>
> After compiling (if/when I do it). Does anything get written on my
> system, elsewhere than where the tarfile is extracted, and the
> compilation is performed? (both are presumably the same folder)

You could do the compilation in a temporary directory like /tmp and delete
everything afterwards. But now that you have a working kppp ... you might
as well stay with it :)

Harri.

Comment 14 Doryforos 2004-07-14 16:40:29 UTC
Would the compilation help you to make kppp better? If so, what do I have to do (apart from compiling)
Comment 15 Andrew Crouthamel 2018-11-02 04:25:16 UTC
Dear Bug Submitter,

This bug has been stagnant for a long time. Could you help us out and re-test if the bug is valid in the latest version? I am setting the status to NEEDSINFO pending your response, please change the Status back to REPORTED when you respond.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
Comment 16 Andrew Crouthamel 2018-11-16 02:46:46 UTC
Dear Bug Submitter,

This is a reminder that this bug has been stagnant for a long time. Could you help us out and re-test if the bug is valid in the latest version?

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
Comment 17 Justin Zobel 2022-12-08 00:00:25 UTC
Thank you for reporting this issue in KDE software. As it has been a while since this issue was reported, can we please ask you to see if you can reproduce the issue with a recent software version?

If you can reproduce the issue, please change the status to "REPORTED" when replying. Thank you!
Comment 18 Bug Janitor Service 2022-12-23 05:20:19 UTC
Dear Bug Submitter,

This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least
15 days. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and set the bug status as REPORTED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDSINFO status with
no change in 30 days the bug will be closed as RESOLVED > WORKSFORME
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our bug triaging procedures please read the
wiki located here:
https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as REPORTED so that the KDE team knows that the bug is
ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
Comment 19 Bug Janitor Service 2023-01-07 05:22:52 UTC
This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least
30 days. The bug is now closed as RESOLVED > WORKSFORME
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our bug triaging procedures please read the
wiki located here:
https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!