Bug 69310 - Status bar in konqueror is ugly
Summary: Status bar in konqueror is ugly
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: konqueror
Classification: Applications
Component: general (other bugs)
Version First Reported In: unspecified
Platform: Mandrake RPMs Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Konqueror Bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-11-30 00:17 UTC by Mohd Asif Ali Rizwaan
Modified: 2024-01-06 16:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mohd Asif Ali Rizwaan 2003-11-30 00:17:47 UTC
Version:           unknown (using KDE 3.1.3)
Installed from:    Mandrake Linux Cooker i586 - Cooker
Compiler:          gcc version 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-2mdk)
OS:          Linux (i686) release 2.4.22-10mdk

Please Open Kmail or type "mailto:abc@abc.com" to get kmail new message window.

You can see the Status bar is more informative and having a docked look, which is better than konqis flat look. 

I want a docked look of status bar in konqueror like in Kmail and other apps (smb4k). and status bar should have 3-4 sections for different type of output like:

1. Message (where connecting, resolving, page loaded messages)
2. Size (size of page)
3. Progress bar
4. Secure (ssl LOCK icon) etc.

thanks.
Comment 1 Sashmit Bhaduri 2003-12-01 19:16:11 UTC
Yes, I think we could get rid of the somewhat nonstandard spinner (nonstandard to KDE), if we had a more informative statusbar. 
Comment 2 Mohd Asif Ali Rizwaan 2005-07-15 00:39:48 UTC
Sorry for the negative remark, but If you choose "Redmond" style, you can see that the status bar looks a bit awkward.
Comment 3 Santtu Pajukanta 2008-07-02 17:38:22 UTC
Not only is the status bar ugly and different from other KDE applications, it's also HUGE. On widescreen displays horizontal space is free, but vertical space is valuable real estate.

Not an actual duplicate, but this problem is discussed also at #66742.
Comment 4 Stephan Kulow 2024-01-06 16:38:32 UTC
this seems *slightly* outdated