Bug 67845 - make reply-to-list smarter
Summary: make reply-to-list smarter
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: kmail
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: openSUSE Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
: 71307 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-11-11 02:37 UTC by stu31371
Modified: 2009-12-18 22:37 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description stu31371 2003-11-11 02:37:30 UTC
Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.1.3)
Installed from:    SuSE RPMs
OS:          Linux

Hi there,

reply-to-list produces only reply-to-sender for Y!-Groups mailing lists (www.yahoo.com). It works fine for e.g. SuSE mailing lists. Reply-to-all works fine in both cases.

This has been found also in KDE 3.1.4
Comment 1 Matej Cepl 2003-11-11 06:53:40 UTC
I have the same beahvior in KDE 3.1.4 on Debian/woody (packages from download.kde.org).
Comment 2 Ingo Klöcker 2003-11-11 10:23:16 UTC
Please attach a sample message to this bug report.
Comment 3 stu31371 2003-11-12 01:01:58 UTC
Here is an example message. I hope all necessary stuff is still in.



X-UIDL: j8f"!CJo"!!io!!/Y<"!
Return-Path: <sentto-1426801-2499-1068582907-...=....@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Received: from x (ims [x.x.x.x])
	by ... (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hABKZgP19242
	for ...; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:35:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: from n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.65])
	by .... with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1AJfEh-0002nZ-00
	for ....; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:35:39 +0100
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-1426801-2499-1068582907-.....=....@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [....] by n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Nov 2003 20:35:08 -0000
X-Sender: ....
X-Apparently-To: groupname@yahoogroups.com
Received: ....
Received: ....
Received: ....
Received: ....
Received: ....
To:  <groupname@yahoogroups.de>
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
Message-Id: <200311112135.04019......>
From: .....
X-Originating-IP: ....
X-Yahoo-Profile: ......
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list groupname@yahoogroups.de; contact theater_hexagon-owner@yahoogroups.de
Delivered-To: mailing list groupname@yahoogroups.de
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:groupname-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.de>
Date: ....
Subject: ....
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 1669
Status: R 
X-Status: N
X-KMail-EncryptionState:  
X-KMail-SignatureState:  

body
Comment 4 Ingo Klöcker 2003-11-12 11:28:38 UTC
The message doesn't have a List-Post header. This standard header is used by KMail to determine the mailing-list address. If this header isn't found then KMail falls back to normal Reply behavior (unless you are in a mailing-list folder).

You have several options:
a) Setup a mailing-list folder for this mailing-list.
b) If you don't want to setup a mailing-list folder then write a filter that adds the List-Post header to those messages, e.g.
"Mailing-List" [contains] "groupname@yahoogroups.de"
"add header" "List-Post" "<mailto:groupname@yahoogroups.de>"
c) Ask Yahoo to add the List-Post header to all mailing-list messages.

I downgrade your bug to a wish.
Comment 5 Matej Cepl 2003-11-14 08:06:34 UTC
Just before 3.2 makes this possible even on IMAP servers, let me put here
a small procmail recipe which I use to fix the headers. Enjoy.

Matej

# $Id: procmailrc,v 1.12 2003/11/07 18:52:54 matej Exp matej $
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin
LOGFILE=$HOME/.log-fix-yahoogroups

:0 fwh
* ! ^List-Post:
* ^Mailing-List:
* ^Reply-To:[ ]+\/.*
| formail -a "List-Post: $MATCH"

:0
|
Comment 6 Ingo Klöcker 2004-02-01 14:50:37 UTC
*** Bug 71307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Matej Cepl 2004-02-12 21:02:10 UTC
Procmail recipe shown above is not necessary for 3.2 anymore (so this is probably a hot candidate for WONTFIX or RESOLVED). There is still one problem remaining (which is now wish# 75095), but otherwise I guess we are done.
Comment 8 Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-09 21:00:55 UTC
Since it is not a bug report what is exactly the (content of) wish?
Comment 9 Björn Ruberg 2009-12-18 22:37:13 UTC
Considering this fixed as long no one states the opposite