Bug 65293 - css statement "display: run-in" is not rendered
Summary: css statement "display: run-in" is not rendered
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 33592
Alias: None
Product: konqueror
Classification: Applications
Component: khtml (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Konqueror Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-01 07:15 UTC by Jos van den Oever
Modified: 2003-10-20 00:32 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments
This webpage contains an example of the bug which was found in W3C's XML Specification. (5.81 KB, text/html)
2003-10-01 07:17 UTC, Jos van den Oever
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jos van den Oever 2003-10-01 07:15:50 UTC
Version:           unknown (using KDE 3.1.92 (alpha2, CVS >= 20030921), compiled sources)
Compiler:          gcc version 3.2.3 (Debian)
OS:          Linux (i686) release 2.6.0-test4

Currently, konqueror contains a very serious error: the css statement display: run-in; is not rendered correctly. An example of this error can be seen in the XML recommendation. This specification becomes incomprehensible due to this error.


The problem in the XML specification is caused by the combined interpretation of the stylesheet and the <style> tag in the document itself. The <style> tag in the document contains the following information:

<style type="text/css">
code {
        font-family: monospace;
}
div.constraint, div.issue, div.note, div.notice {
        margin-left: 2em;
}
dt.label {
        display: run-in;
}
li p {
        margin-top: 0.3em;
        margin-bottom: 0.3em;
}
</style>

It is obvious that the definition of display: run-in; in the css definition of <dt> is causing the problems.
Comment 1 Jos van den Oever 2003-10-01 07:17:07 UTC
Created attachment 2657 [details]
This webpage contains an example of the bug which was found in W3C's XML Specification.
Comment 2 Dirk Mueller 2003-10-20 00:32:36 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33592 ***