Bug 62852 - frameborder not supported ?
Summary: frameborder not supported ?
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 32563
Alias: None
Product: konqueror
Classification: Applications
Component: khtml renderer (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Konqueror Developers
URL:
Keywords:
: 73817 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-08-18 00:33 UTC by mporta
Modified: 2005-06-22 04:35 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description mporta 2003-08-18 00:33:56 UTC
Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.1.2)
Installed from:    Unlisted Binary Package
OS:          Linux

It seems that khtml does not support frameborder, it simply displays the frames without the border.
Example:
<frameset cols="200,*" bordercolor="#63baff" frameborder="yes" framespacing="2" >
  <frame name="toc" src="arch_contents.html" >
  <frame name="content" src="main.html">
</frameset>

this code shows the border between the two frames only under mozilla or internet explorer.
instead using konqueror I see no border.

Thanks.
Comment 1 Sashmit Bhaduri 2004-02-01 23:49:54 UTC
*** Bug 73817 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Stephan Kulow 2004-02-02 11:03:17 UTC
hmm, 73817 is about frameborder=0 and this one is about ="yes" while the HTML 4.0.1 spec got frameborder=(0|1)
Comment 3 Samuel Edlmeier 2004-05-11 20:02:27 UTC
This problem still exists in KDE 3.2.2. 
 
Comment 4 kavol 2004-05-24 22:04:47 UTC
Regardless of the atribute value, I consider this bug invalid, because "frameborder" is not defined for the element "frameset".
See http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/index/attributes.html, for example.

btw, with Konqueror 3.2.2, everything seems OK for me with frameborders

p.s. As for frames, I have a suspection that the CSS border atribute implementation is wrong (?) but I have no time to investigate :-(
Comment 5 Maksim Orlovich 2005-06-22 04:35:26 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32563 ***