Bug 506436 - .pot files have changed but these elements in .po file are not marked fuzzy
Summary: .pot files have changed but these elements in .po file are not marked fuzzy
Status: RESOLVED NOT A BUG
Alias: None
Product: i18n
Classification: Translations
Component: general (other bugs)
Version First Reported In: unspecified
Platform: Other Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Albert Astals Cid
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2025-07-01 13:39 UTC by Freek de Kruijf
Modified: 2025-07-06 21:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Freek de Kruijf 2025-07-01 13:39:07 UTC
SUMMARY
In messages/documentation-docs-kdenlive-org/ apparently .pot files have changed, but corresponding elements in .po files have not been marked fuzzy.


STEPS TO REPRODUCE
I performed "posieve check-rules --skip-obsolete -s rfile:pology/lang/ca/
rules/restructuredtext.rules nl/messages/documentation-docs-kdenlive-org/"
and found 460 problems in the .po files in 
nl/messages/documentation-docs-kdenlive-org/

OBSERVED RESULT
Analyzing the errors I found changes in msgid lines like :ref: changed in 
:doc: without marking such an element as fuzzy.

EXPECTED RESULT
The corresponding elements in .po files should be marked fuzzy


SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Operating System: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20250627
KDE Plasma: 
KDE Plasma Version: 6.4.1
KDE Frameworks Version: 6.15.0
Qt Version: 6.9.1
Comment 1 Freek de Kruijf 2025-07-02 13:23:49 UTC
I am sorry. This appeared only once, so no need to to investigate.
Previously running the given command gave me 20 errors, which were false positives.
Now suddenly I got 460 errors of which only one showed the reported problem.

The real problem is in the rules file pology/lang/ca/rules/restructuredtext.rules .

One of which is apparently in the definition for :doc:` , id=rst-doc
Comment 2 Albert Astals Cid 2025-07-02 20:04:44 UTC
Closing then.

Not sure why you're using Catalan rules, but if you think it's buggy discuss it with them?
Comment 3 Freek de Kruijf 2025-07-03 10:44:56 UTC
Thanks. The Catalan rules are also applicable for Dutch; they are about formatting certain elements in .rst files. I don't have the skills to design my own rules.

After a recent change at least one of the rules gives trouble only for the elements in documentation-docs-kdenlive-org. I contacted the designers and got an answer. Still usable for 4 other series of these files: digikam-doc, websites-krita-org, websites-docs-glaxnimate-org, and documentation-kstars-docs-kde-org
Comment 4 Albert Astals Cid 2025-07-03 23:07:10 UTC
Right, if the rules are not Catalan specific maybe they should not be in the Catalan folder :)
Comment 5 Freek de Kruijf 2025-07-04 09:00:28 UTC
Right, but they are designed/maintained by a Catalan person. I just read about it and tried to use these rules for the Dutch language and it turned out to be useful; even VERY useful. I do have a few false positives, except now for the kdenlive documents.
Comment 6 Albert Astals Cid 2025-07-06 21:52:10 UTC
I understand they are designed by a Catalan person, but if they are not Catalan specific, they should be in a common place that is community owned.

Do you feel like contacting the person doing them to try to make them be in a bit more of a shared space?