Bug 502308 - Stacked people confirmation areas usability.
Summary: Stacked people confirmation areas usability.
Status: REPORTED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Faces-Workflow (show other bugs)
Version: 8.6.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows Microsoft Windows
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2025-04-02 08:33 UTC by Alexandre Belz
Modified: 2025-04-11 18:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments
Screen capture of the issue (2.00 MB, image/png)
2025-04-02 08:33 UTC, Alexandre Belz
Details
attachment-3156681-0.html (2.82 KB, text/html)
2025-04-02 12:33 UTC, Alexandre Belz
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexandre Belz 2025-04-02 08:33:45 UTC
Created attachment 179930 [details]
Screen capture of the issue

SUMMARY
For pictures with many unknown/unconfirmed people, it is difficult to understand which rectangle area correspond to a unconfirmed name. See attached screen capture.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. Open a picture with many new people.
2. Search faces.
3. Just click on a "Unknown" naming popup/field. It turns blue, which is great.

OBSERVED RESULT
3a. it is really difficult to understand to which rectangle/face it corresponds. I need to zoom in, and even so, sometime it's not sufficient as some face rectangles may overlap.
3b. Reversely, If I select a face rectangle, it stays white. The corresponding unknown naming field is also staying in the same color. This does not help me to understand where is the name edition field amongst all the unknown ones.

EXPECTED RESULT
3. It would be really useful that the selected face rectangle turns blue, the same color than the corresponding Unkown People Name confirmation popup.
3b. Reversely, If I select a face rectangle, it should turn blue (selected), and blue also for the corresponding name edition fields/popup.

SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows: 10 22H2
KDE Frameworks Version: 6.10.0
Qt Version: 6.8.1
Comment 1 Maik Qualmann 2025-04-02 12:20:47 UTC
I don't think it'll be any better if all unknown faces have a blue border.

Why show all faces at all? If you hover your mouse over a face, only that one is displayed and can be edited.

Maik
Comment 2 Alexandre Belz 2025-04-02 12:33:05 UTC
Created attachment 179934 [details]
attachment-3156681-0.html

Hi Maik,

I meant that only one single currently focused people would have the blue lines, both for
• rectangle
• and name entry

Would you like me to create a mockup ?

BR,
Alexandre



-------- Message d'origine --------
De : Maik Qualmann <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org>
Date : 02/04/2025 14:20 (GMT+01:00)
À : alexandre.belz@live.fr
Objet : [digikam] [Bug 502308] Stacked people confirmation areas usability.

https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.kde.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D502308&data=05%7C02%7C%7C5ebbfb4d2a3245c419a408dd71e0cdf1%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638791932513433563%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=38atKxIZmj4GmoClpBA3V5ni5XLBqxrt3nOrNAXUdJc%3D&reserved=0<https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502308>

Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |metzpinguin@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> ---
I don't think it'll be any better if all unknown faces have a blue border.

Why show all faces at all? If you hover your mouse over a face, only that one
is displayed and can be edited.

Maik

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.
Comment 3 caulier.gilles 2025-04-11 18:13:39 UTC
Hi,

The 8.7.0 pre-release Windows installer from today have been rebuilt from
scratch with Qt 6.8.3, KDE 6.12, OpenCV 4.11 + CUDA support, Exiv2 0.28.5, ExifTool 13.27, ffmpeg 7, all image codecs updated to last version (jxl, avif, heif, aom, etc.).

Please try with this version to see if your problem still reproducible...

https://files.kde.org/digikam/

Thanks in advance
Best regards

Gilles Caulier