Created attachment 177171 [details]
Genuine Very Big KDE Next Wallpaper vs Extremely Small, Superb Quality Compressed Wallpaper

Hi,

This is for all versions. Please CC to everyone in KDE to investigate. This is easy to prove.

What happened:
Somebody marked a bug as "RESOLVED", while not even touching it at all! Just because they don't understand the bug, doesn't mean this person should be allowed to hide their own incompetence. Its just a simple man page away to solve this issue (!). Easy and takes 5-10 min. tops.

What should be done:
Investigation by multiple KDE people to solve:
1) easy bug to fix (requires 5 min to read a single manpage and other 5 min. to resolve the issue once and for all).

What is the bug:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484317

What is the problem in fake "resolved bug":
1. big files,
2. slow KDE throughout
3. Falsifying KDE bug trucker

How to prove: 
Compare the gigantic size difference and loading speed of the two KDE Next wallpapers, ie compare the attached, compressed wallpaper with the one you have in /usr/share/wallappers and the attatech compressed wallpaper. 

Its really a HUGE difference in loading speed and size. The way it should be, but someone FALSELY marekd this bug as solved. Why? Is it so hard to read a single manpage and do:

$ for F in *.png do avifenc -c aom/rav1e -a ..... $F {....

I hope not. Then why someone did it? Don't we all want fast and responsive KDE? Aren't we working towoards the same goal? I don't understand :(. It makes me sad.

Kinfo:
all versions of KDE (esp. KDE 6.xx).