SUMMARY *** In the batch manager, in the «return image» tool, the option «vertical» and «horizontal» seems to be inversed. The result is the opposite of the one we get in the image editor, with the horizotal return and vertical return. Moreover, the return operation in the batch conversion tool takes far more time (around 8 - 10 s per image) than in the image edition window, where this operation is almost instantaneous. *** STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. select image and put in the batch conversion queue 2. select «retourner» tool and vertical option 3. execute OBSERVED RESULT the image is returned in the horizontal axis EXPECTED RESULT Image returned in the vertical axis, as it is done with the similar tool in the image edit windows (F4). SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Windows: macOS: Linux/KDE Plasma: (available in About System) KDE Plasma Version: KDE Frameworks Version: Qt Version: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Can you lead me to the right BQM tool? The BQM Rotation Tool has no option for "horizontal" or "vertical" for me. The BQM Mirroring Tool would have this option, but it works correctly. Maik
Hello, sorry if I was not clear. Here are two captures. The first one is the tool I talk about, which is in the batch manager queue. The second one is the tool that is in the image editor tool (the one which opens when pressing F4). They work on the opposite the one with the other, and i feel the later one is the correct one. Also, the speed is significantly higher in the image editor than in the queue batch.
Created attachment 166255 [details] The tool in the BQM
Created attachment 166256 [details] The same tools in the image editor window
Ok, this tool is the mirroring for me. The image is either mirrored on the horizontal or vertical center axis. I have no difference in the mirroring between BQM and Editor. At the speed, keep in mind that you have already loaded the image in the editor when you perform the function. The loading time is included in the BQM when executing. Maybe upload a sample image with which the problem can be reproduced. Maik
Hello, I did a new verification, and now I can not reproduce de bug. Very strange. May be initially a confusion on my side ? If it is the case, I deeply apologize. However, with my new test, I does not seem to have an inversion. Therefore, I guess the bug can be closed. Sorry again.