Created attachment 163932 [details] screenshot of widget and the settings panel, above one suppose to say "redmi9c bar" SUMMARY SSIDs are displayed as weird characters. STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. No idea :/ 2. 3. OBSERVED RESULT Weird characters in SSIDs EXPECTED RESULT I expected to see normal characters SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Windows: macOS: Linux: 6.5.0 (available in About System) KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.9 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.107.0 Qt Version: 5.15.10 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
And those aren't the names of the networks themselves? Are there any other networks within scanning range? Do they all look weird like this? Or do they look normal?
Hi Nate, I am 100% certain those are not the names of the networks. Wifi is named "redmi9c bar" and ethernet connection is named "docker" visible in the screenshot. Those aren't random scanned SSIDs. Both shown as connected in the attachment. SSID changes when its connected. It looked normal in the disconnected section under the hrule.
How strange. Do you by any chance have an NVIDIA GPU?
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3) > How strange. Do you by any chance have an NVIDIA GPU? I'm on a lenovo thinkpad e14 with amd chipset.
Hmm, thanks.
Bulk transfer as requested in T17796
Thanks for the bug report, and I'm sorry we didn't manage to investigate this one more deeply yet. A lot has changed since the issue was reported, in both Plasma and the networking stack in general; can I ask you to see if it's still happening in Plasma 6.3.5 or later with Frameworks 6.14 or later? Thanks a lot!
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #7) > Thanks for the bug report, and I'm sorry we didn't manage to investigate > this one more deeply yet. A lot has changed since the issue was reported, in > both Plasma and the networking stack in general; can I ask you to see if > it's still happening in Plasma 6.3.5 or later with Frameworks 6.14 or later? > Thanks a lot! Hi Nate, I haven't on KDE for a while. But haven't come across this while I was on KDE. Maybe we can close the issue.
OK, thanks!
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #9) > OK, thanks! Thanks to you too for looking into it, Best, Barış