Bug 468626 - Error in the description of the Rename options
Summary: Error in the description of the Rename options
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: AdvancedRename-dialog (other bugs)
Version First Reported In: 8.0.0
Platform: Other Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-04-17 18:50 UTC by Nicofo
Modified: 2023-04-29 04:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed/Implemented In: 8.1.0
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nicofo 2023-04-17 18:50:33 UTC
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. In the rename tool window, click on the "Show a list of all available options" button
2. Al the options are listed, amongs other;
  #[options,start]    Sequence number (custom start) 
  #[options,step]     Sequence number (custom step) 
3. I suppose that second line is wrong (a unique number in brackets is considered as the custom start and not the custom step: example: #[3])

4. Note: but the following syntax is missing in the description (a sequence number with custom start but without options is valid): 
  #[start]     Sequence number (custom start) 

Note: see image of the error: https://imgur.com/Et6K1BZ
Comment 1 Maik Qualmann 2023-04-17 19:17:07 UTC
Everything is correct, some options only refer to "c" for example [c,step] others refer to option "f" for example.

Maik
Comment 2 Maik Qualmann 2023-04-17 19:46:39 UTC
Git commit a15bdcbdc2a1085b18f22eed3e53ed0442975e7b by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 17/04/2023 at 19:45.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.

add possible rename options to the description
FIXED-IN: 8.1.0

M  +1    -1    NEWS
M  +3    -3    core/utilities/advancedrename/parser/options/sequencenumberoption.cpp

https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/commit/a15bdcbdc2a1085b18f22eed3e53ed0442975e7b
Comment 3 Nicofo 2023-04-17 20:19:11 UTC
Ah, OK, sorry for my misunderstanding.
But it was not so easy to understand I believe --> thank you for the added clarifications.
Comment 4 Maik Qualmann 2023-04-29 04:19:34 UTC
*** Bug 469118 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***