Created attachment 153687 [details] application list in the Plasma Firewall "Add rule" dialog is broken SUMMARY In the Add rule dialog of Plasma Firewall in System Settings, clicking the "Application" option doesn't show anything and seems to be broken – See the Attached screenshot STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Open system settings, go to Plasma Firewall section, 2. Click add rule and in the dialog that opens, click the Application option 3. No list of Applications will be shown OBSERVED RESULT The application list in the Plasma Firewall "Add rule" dialog is broken, nothing is shown EXPECTED RESULT Plasma Firewall should allow for choosing predefined applications in the add rule dialoge SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Linux/KDE Plasma: KDE Neon User (Jammy based, Ubuntu 22.04) (available in About System) KDE Plasma Version: 5.26.2 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.99 Qt Version: 5.15.7 Kernel: 5.15.0-52 generic 64bit UFW version: 0.36.1-4build1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See the Attached screenshot
Hi thebluequasar@mailo.com, this happens when part of ufw is missing, maybe you need to install an additional package?
.
(In reply to Lucas Biaggi from comment #1) > Hi thebluequasar@mailo.com, this happens when part of ufw is missing, maybe > you need to install an additional package? Hello, do you know what package it might be, more specifically? I've searched and couldn't find any extra or additional packages for UFW on Ubuntu repos. Since this is a fairly new installation of KDE Neon, it sounds a bit unlikely to me that a missing package could be causing this.
(In reply to thebluequasar from comment #3) > (In reply to Lucas Biaggi from comment #1) > > Hi thebluequasar@mailo.com, this happens when part of ufw is missing, maybe > > you need to install an additional package? > > Hello, do you know what package it might be, more specifically? I've > searched and couldn't find any extra or additional packages for UFW on > Ubuntu repos. Since this is a fairly new installation of KDE Neon, it sounds > a bit unlikely to me that a missing package could be causing this. I really don't know because I don't use Neon, but you could start the firewall module from CLI with "kcmshell5 kcm_firewall" to see what is happening. I still believe something is not right, as we just read info from ufw to fill that dropdown.
(In reply to Lucas Biaggi from comment #4) > I really don't know because I don't use Neon, but you could start the > firewall module from CLI with "kcmshell5 kcm_firewall" to see what is > happening. I still believe something is not right, as we just read info from > ufw to fill that dropdown. Thank you. I ran the Plasma Firewall from the terminal with the command you gave, and I pasted the output below. There is also a debug message in there. here is the terminal output: kcmshell5 kcm_firewall ufw.client: Ufw is loaded? true qml: services available: [] QQmlExpression: Expression file:///usr/share/kpackage/kcms/kcm_firewall/contents/ui/About.qml:22:13 depends on non-NOTIFYable properties: FirewallClient::name QQmlExpression: Expression file:///usr/share/kpackage/kcms/kcm_firewall/contents/ui/SimpleRuleEdit.qml:39:9 depends on non-NOTIFYable properties: FirewallClient::name QQmlExpression: Expression file:///usr/share/kpackage/kcms/kcm_firewall/contents/ui/SimpleRuleEdit.qml:34:9 depends on non-NOTIFYable properties: FirewallClient::name QQmlExpression: Expression file:///usr/share/kpackage/kcms/kcm_firewall/contents/ui/SimpleRuleEdit.qml:22:9 depends on non-NOTIFYable properties: FirewallClient::name ufw.client: Status query starting ufw.client: Starting the Status Query file:///usr/share/kpackage/kcms/kcm_firewall/contents/ui/main.qml:139:13: QML ColumnLayout: Cannot anchor to an item that isn't a parent or sibling. Debug message from helper: Command /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexec/kde_ufw_plugin_helper.py ("--status", "--defaults", "--list", "--modules") "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?><ufw><status enabled=\"true\" /><defaults incoming=\"deny\" outgoing=\"allow\" loglevel=\"low\" ipv6=\"yes\" /><rules><rule position=\"0\" action=\"allow\" direction=\"in\" dapp=\"\" sapp=\"\" dport=\"1714:1764\" sport=\"any\" protocol=\"udp\" dst=\"0.0.0.0/0\" src=\"192.168.1.0/24\" interface_in=\"\" interface_out=\"\" v6=\"False\" logtype=\"\" /><rule position=\"0\" action=\"allow\" direction=\"in\" dapp=\"\" sapp=\"\" dport=\"1714:1764\" sport=\"any\" protocol=\"tcp\" dst=\"0.0.0.0/0\" src=\"192.168.1.0/24\" interface_in=\"\" interface_out=\"\" v6=\"False\" logtype=\"\" /><rule position=\"0\" action=\"allow\" direction=\"in\" dapp=\"Samba\" sapp=\"\" dport=\"137,138\" sport=\"any\" protocol=\"udp\" dst=\"0.0.0.0/0\" src=\"192.168.0.0/16\" interface_in=\"\" interface_out=\"\" v6=\"False\" logtype=\"\" /></rules><modules enabled=\"\" /></ufw>\n" ufw.client: Status Query finished, setting the profile ufw.client: Profile Received, Setting the profile on the model Profile on the model received. enabled? true ufw.client: Setting the known applications to () qml: services available: [] Hope this is useful. Please let me know if there are any other commands I could run or other things to try, to generate more information and post the results.
ufw lists available applications but the firewall kcm does not: paul@desktop:~$ sudo ufw app list Available applications: CUPS OpenSSH paul@desktop:~$ sudo /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexec/kde_ufw_plugin_helper.py --list <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ufw><rules></rules></ufw>
In reply to Paul Worrall from comment #6) > ufw lists available applications but the firewall kcm does not: > > paul@desktop:~$ sudo ufw app list > Available applications: > CUPS > OpenSSH > > paul@desktop:~$ sudo > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexec/kde_ufw_plugin_helper.py --list > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ufw><rules></rules></ufw> we don't use the helper to retrieve the list, as you can see here: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-firewall/-/blob/master/kcm/backends/ufw/helper/helper.cpp#L107-130 I tried to replicate this behaviour and I couldn't obtain the same result. Can you try a live ISO with KDE? My ufw version ufw 0.36.1 Copyright 2008-2018 Canonical Ltd. What is yours?
(In reply to Lucas Biaggi from comment #7) > In reply to Paul Worrall from comment #6) > > ufw lists available applications but the firewall kcm does not: > > > > paul@desktop:~$ sudo ufw app list > > Available applications: > > CUPS > > OpenSSH > > > > paul@desktop:~$ sudo > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexec/kde_ufw_plugin_helper.py --list > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ufw><rules></rules></ufw> > > we don't use the helper to retrieve the list, as you can see here: > https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-firewall/-/blob/master/kcm/backends/ufw/ > helper/helper.cpp#L107-130 > > I tried to replicate this behaviour and I couldn't obtain the same result. > > Can you try a live ISO with KDE? > > My ufw version > ufw 0.36.1 > Copyright 2008-2018 Canonical Ltd. > > What is yours? Ops, helper == the python script.
Created attachment 154018 [details] Screen recording Sorry, I realised it wasn't the python script soon after posting my last comment. I have reproduced the problem using the latest iso of KDE Neon User Edition (neon-user-20221117-0714.iso), please let me know it there's another distro you'd like me to try. Also, I'm able to try changes to the code if you want me to try something. ufw --version gives: ufw 0.36.1 Copyright 2008-2021 Canonical Ltd. I attach a video showing what I'm doing in case it's any help
(In reply to Paul Worrall from comment #9) > Created attachment 154018 [details] > Screen recording > > Sorry, I realised it wasn't the python script soon after posting my last > comment. > > I have reproduced the problem using the latest iso of KDE Neon User Edition > (neon-user-20221117-0714.iso), please let me know it there's another distro > you'd like me to try. > > Also, I'm able to try changes to the code if you want me to try something. > > ufw --version gives: > ufw 0.36.1 > Copyright 2008-2021 Canonical Ltd. > > I attach a video showing what I'm doing in case it's any help Okay, I downloaded the same image and was able to reproduce it, I'll start working to find a fix to that, but at the first glance, it shouldn't change it behaviour. Since it just collects the output from “ufw app list”. Can you test it in another distro (don't need to be arch-based, but one that doesn't use Ubuntu as it)? The major diff identified is the app list, which is drastically different.
A possibly relevant merge request was started @ https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-firewall/-/merge_requests/59