Bug 458627 - Unconfirmed faces do not show up
Summary: Unconfirmed faces do not show up
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Faces-Workflow (show other bugs)
Version: 7.8.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows Microsoft Windows
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2022-09-02 07:12 UTC by Stefan
Modified: 2022-09-06 20:06 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 7.9.0


Attachments
DigikamDebug Log (91.97 KB, text/plain)
2022-09-02 12:15 UTC, Stefan
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Stefan 2022-09-02 07:12:18 UTC
Hi,

after installing Digikam 7.8.0 no unconfirmed persons appear in the main view. The status bar states that no entry is selected out of zero entries, but the scrollbar on the right indicates that there are a lot of entries (and I know for sure, that there have been a lot of entries before the update).

Thanks for reading and thanks a lot for your work!

STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. Install Digikam 7.8.0
2. Open "Unconfirmed Persons"
3. 

OBSERVED RESULT
No faces/persons shown

EXPECTED RESULT
Faces/persons should be shown

SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows: 7
KDE Frameworks Version: 5.96.0
Qt Version: 5.15.5 (built against 5.15.5)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
I hope I chose the right "Severity", maybe you can add a paragraph about this on the "Get Involved/Issue Reporting" page.
Comment 1 Stefan 2022-09-02 07:23:48 UTC
*** Bug 458628 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Maik Qualmann 2022-09-02 11:19:42 UTC
Please download DebugView from Microsoft and start it. Activate the internal debugging in the digiKam setup under Miscellaneous-> System and start digiKam again. Now play with the Unconfirmed face tag/view and post all the output from the DebugView window.

Maik
Comment 3 Stefan 2022-09-02 12:15:20 UTC
Created attachment 151781 [details]
DigikamDebug Log
Comment 4 Stefan 2022-09-02 12:16:21 UTC
Hi Mike,

thanks for looking into this. I wasn't able to filter out the non-Digikam related lines, but I think the log does the job.

Best regards
Stefan
Comment 5 Maik Qualmann 2022-09-02 12:29:43 UTC
The log doesn't show any problems at first, but I could only tell if the database was still consistent if I examined it. What strikes me, you have activated the database cleanup at the start?
Since I've never been able to reproduce the specific issues with unconfirmed faces shown and not present in the view, the enabled database cleanup could be the trigger for the issues.

Maik
Comment 6 Stefan 2022-09-02 13:36:55 UTC
Hi Maik,

I had "Maintenance" -> "Database Clean-Up" enabled and the "Settings" -> "Miscellaneous" -> "Search for new Items on Start-Up" (tranlated to the best of my knowledge) and disabled that now, but after I switched both items off, there is no change.
Have I found the right settings?

Best regards
Stefan
Comment 7 Maik Qualmann 2022-09-02 14:12:52 UTC
Yes, this is the option for cleaning up the database. I consider this option completely unnecessary when starting digiKam. Cleaning up database is completely sufficient once a year, or if many images are always deleted and added, maybe once a month. This can then also be started in the maintenance tool.
The problem as it is currently implemented, that we start scanning for new items and cleaning up the database at the same time, so that problems arise are already logical. Either we run both jobs in cascade or remove clean up database completely from the startup.

Maik
Comment 8 Stefan 2022-09-02 16:24:21 UTC
Hi Maik,

I did a full clean with all options manually and turned of the automatic maintenance at start-up, but the issue still persists.

Best regards
Stefan
Comment 9 Maik Qualmann 2022-09-02 18:56:50 UTC
Your database is broken, we probably won't be able to fix it with an update. We can only prevent it from happening again if possible. You will have to start with a new database. How big is the digiKam.4.db if you create a ZIP file? Is it possible to send it to me and I can see if it can be fixed?

Maik
Comment 10 Maik Qualmann 2022-09-02 20:09:43 UTC
Git commit 6cdf371b949812ff5e68b5d9989c8332ed13c657 by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 02/09/2022 at 20:08.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.

move clean up database to the splash screen stage and wait for ready
Related: bug 432760

M  +19   -6    core/app/main/digikamapp.cpp

https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/commit/6cdf371b949812ff5e68b5d9989c8332ed13c657
Comment 11 Maik Qualmann 2022-09-02 20:12:38 UTC
Git commit be99547043a370206dc6592cff2ac2174622c3f8 by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 02/09/2022 at 20:12.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'qt5-maintenance'.

move clean up database to the splash screen stage and wait for ready
Related: bug 432760

M  +19   -6    core/app/main/digikamapp.cpp

https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/commit/be99547043a370206dc6592cff2ac2174622c3f8
Comment 12 Stefan 2022-09-06 08:41:13 UTC
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #9)
> Your database is broken, we probably won't be able to fix it with an update.
> We can only prevent it from happening again if possible. You will have to
> start with a new database. How big is the digiKam.4.db if you create a ZIP
> file? Is it possible to send it to me and I can see if it can be fixed?
> 
> Maik

Hi Maik, 

my database as zip file is 16.8 MB, I can send it to you, if that isn't too big.

Best regards
Stefan
Comment 13 Maik Qualmann 2022-09-06 10:29:33 UTC
Yes, try it, GMail accepts attachments up to 25 MB.

Maik
Comment 14 Maik Qualmann 2022-09-06 19:53:26 UTC
The database actually does not contain any Unconfirmed face regions in the ImageTagProperties table. The fact that no images are displayed is correct according to the status of the database. The cause could have been the database cleanup at the digiKam start together with the search for new images.

Create a new face recognition training database in the maintenance tool and restart face recognition to have Unconfirmed faces again.

For the time being I'm closing the bug, if the problem occurs again with the corrected version, open this bug again.

Maik