Bug 452501 - Digikam crashes when going from one album to another
Summary: Digikam crashes when going from one album to another
Status: REPORTED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Bundle-FlatPak (other bugs)
Version First Reported In: 7.6.0
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR crash
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2022-04-11 14:02 UTC by jens.verwaerde
Modified: 2025-04-12 06:08 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description jens.verwaerde 2022-04-11 14:02:10 UTC
SUMMARY
***
NOTE: If you are reporting a crash, please try to attach a backtrace with debug symbols.
See https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Debugging/How_to_create_useful_crash_reports
***


STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. start digikam (in my case with 38.000 pictures, no video)
2. use it a while after it has settled down looking for new pictures
3. go from one album to another

OBSERVED RESULT
DK crashes, no indication of error, not a problem to restart it later

EXPECTED RESULT


SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Linux/KDE Plasma: Kubuntu
KDE Plasma Version: 5.22.5
KDE Frameworks Version: 5.86.0
Qt Version: 5.15.2

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Comment 1 caulier.gilles 2022-04-11 15:15:16 UTC
Run digiKam from a console into GDB as explained here :

https://www.digikam.org/contribute/

... and report back-trace here.

Gilles Caulier
Comment 2 Maik Qualmann 2022-04-11 15:20:08 UTC
Ubuntu Packages mean Snap Package? Snap packages use a sandbox and are unusable for using digiKam.
Use our AppImage on Ubuntu.

Maik
Comment 3 jens.verwaerde 2022-04-12 09:16:01 UTC
My Digikam (7.6.0) is ran from flatpak (in Kubuntu 21.10). When I follow the advice, i.e. in terminal, run the following:
1   export QT_LOGGING_RULES="digikam*=true"
2   digikam

(see https://www.digikam.org/contribute/)

... I get, after having entered line 1, and typed "digikam", the message that there is no digikam and that I should or could install Digikam using snap or whatever.

But it is not possible to start digikam from the terminal.

Even when I start digikam in terminal as "flatpak run digikam", I get an error. I do not know how to run Flatpak digikam in terminal, as I find no information on the sentence to use.
Comment 4 Maik Qualmann 2022-04-12 09:19:45 UTC
Flatpak are also useless and use a sandbox. Other projects (Kate) have already canceled Flatpak. We also do not provide the flatpaks. Please test it with our AppImage.

Maik
Comment 5 caulier.gilles 2023-03-16 15:42:26 UTC
Jens,

Any feedback here following recommendations from Mail ?

Gilles Caulier
Comment 6 caulier.gilles 2023-04-09 07:57:36 UTC
Jens, any feedback here ?

Can you try with current 8.0.0 pre-release AppImage bundle available here :

https://files.kde.org/digikam/

Gilles Caulier
Comment 7 caulier.gilles 2023-04-19 05:57:29 UTC
@jens.verwaerde@gmail.com

digiKam 8.0.0 is released. This file still valid ?

Gilles Caulier
Comment 8 caulier.gilles 2023-10-11 05:50:00 UTC
Jens,

What's about this file using current 8.2.0 AppImage Linux bundle ? It's
reproducible ?

https://files.kde.org/digikam/

Thanks in advance

Gilles Caulier
Comment 9 caulier.gilles 2024-03-28 07:06:31 UTC
@Jens,

digiKam 8.3.0 stable version is released and available at usual place :

https://www.digikam.org/download/

Can you reproduce the dysfunction on your computer ?

Thanks in advance

Gilles Caulier
Comment 10 caulier.gilles 2024-12-02 06:41:29 UTC
Hi,

digiKam 8.5.0. is out with many fixes and improvements.

https://www.digikam.org/news/2024-11-16-8.5.0_release_announcement/

This report still valid with this version?
Thanks in advance

Gilles Caulier
Comment 11 caulier.gilles 2025-03-15 15:32:21 UTC
Hi,

digiKam 8.6.0 is just released:

https://www.digikam.org/news/2025-03-15-8.6.0_release_announcement/

Problem still exists with this version?

Thanks in advance

Gilles Caulier
Comment 12 caulier.gilles 2025-04-12 06:08:32 UTC
Jens, any feedback here ?