Bug 449477 - Add view option for separating/grouping images by camera or device
Summary: Add view option for separating/grouping images by camera or device
Status: REPORTED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Albums-ItemGroup (show other bugs)
Version: 7.5.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows Microsoft Windows
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
: 484094 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2022-02-01 21:14 UTC by José Oliver-Didier
Modified: 2024-03-20 18:34 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description José Oliver-Didier 2022-02-01 21:14:44 UTC
SUMMARY
Add view option for separating/grouping images by camera or device


STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. Launch Digikam 7.5.0
2. Select an Album with images taken using diffrent devices/cameras
3. Go to menubar and select "Views" -> "Separate Items"

OBSERVED RESULT
- No option for "Camera" or "Device" exists

EXPECTED RESULT
- Option to separate/group 

SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows 11


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
- Windows Photo Gallery had a similar option for grouping devices using the EXIF Camera "Model" and "Maker" data into a single grouping option. It happens that some camera makers repeat the "Maker" name in the exif "Model" so Windows Photo Gallery would not repeat the maker's name. For example:

Case 1:  Maker="Google", Model="Pixel  3" would appear as "Google Pixel 3" as the grouping item.
Case 2:  Maker="Canon", Model="Canon EOS REBEL T3i" would appear as "Canon EOS REBEL T3i" (instead of "Canon Canon EOS REBEL T3i")

- This grouping option is quite usefull when working with multiple devices and cameras and one wishes to apply specific metadata based on camera make/model.
Comment 1 Maik Qualmann 2022-02-02 20:05:06 UTC
I programmed it as a test for the camera category. However, I knew beforehand that it would be very slow. Why? Technically, we have an item info that reads a lot of information from the database once and then keeps it in a memory cache. The photo information is not cached because we don't need it in the view. A lot more work is also needed so that building a view with several 10,000 items doesn't take minutes. Incidentally, the same applies to the location information. I don't think we will implement the category according to locations, as there are already wishes for a sidebar for locations.

Maik
Comment 2 Maik Qualmann 2022-02-02 21:24:24 UTC
Ok, it's not entirely correct. We have a cache for the image metadata. But it's too slow...

Maik
Comment 3 Maik Qualmann 2024-03-20 18:34:16 UTC
*** Bug 484094 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***