Bug 434667 - [plasmoid] bouncing animation for first and second position launchers create a glitch
Summary: [plasmoid] bouncing animation for first and second position launchers create ...
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: lattedock
Classification: Unmaintained
Component: application (other bugs)
Version First Reported In: git (master)
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michail Vourlakos
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-03-20 13:53 UTC by qwerty287
Modified: 2024-11-11 07:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments
film that shows the problem (576.02 KB, video/webm)
2021-03-20 13:53 UTC, qwerty287
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description qwerty287 2021-03-20 13:53:50 UTC
Created attachment 136883 [details]
film that shows the problem

SUMMARY
When I start two Applications at the same time and they "jump" at the same time, there is a graphical problem, just see the film below.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. start two applications almost at the same time
2. wait a moment

OBSERVED RESULT
The icons of the applications are briefly on top of each other.

EXPECTED RESULT
The icons stay where they should be.

SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows: 
macOS: 
Linux/KDE Plasma: Kubuntu 20.04 and KDE Neon Developer Edition
(available in About System)
KDE Plasma Version: 5.19.15 and 5.21.80
KDE Frameworks Version: 5.74.0 and 5.81.0
Qt Version: 5.14.2 and 5.15.2

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Comment 1 Michail Vourlakos 2021-03-20 15:26:23 UTC
I dont think this is fixable... it is the way plasma libtaskmanager works to remove and add tasks in different state.

Nonetheless let's leave it open for the future and as reference.

in my latte git version system this is reproducable on when the launchers are at positions 0 and 1, for any subsequent positions I can not reproduce.
Comment 2 qwerty287 2021-03-20 16:57:39 UTC
(Yes, it's only if the applications are on first/second position. I forgot to write it in my first comment.)
It's okay if it's not fixable, so it's not very problematic, but it's a little bit wired.
Comment 3 qwerty287 2021-03-20 16:59:00 UTC
(In reply to ndev from comment #2)
> (Yes, it's only if the applications are on first/second position. I forgot
> to write it in my first comment.)
> It's okay if it's not fixable, so it's not very problematic, but it's a
> little bit wired.
weird, not wired