Created attachment 136117 [details] Sample SUMMARY The directories with the Cyrillic names go ahead of the Latin, while must be after STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Create 2 directories, one with Latin name, and one with a Cyrillic name OBSERVED RESULT Cyrillic one goes first. EXPECTED RESULT Cyrillic must be the last. SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Operating System: Slackware-current KDE Plasma Version: 5.21.0 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.79.0 Qt Version: 5.15.2 Kernel Version: 5.10.18 OS Type: 64-bit Graphics Platform: X11 Processors: 12 × Intel® Core™ i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz Memory: 31.1 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: Mesa Intel® UHD Graphics 630 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See the attachment
Why?
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #1) > Why? I wander too. ls shows the correct order … Private/ RailsClub/ Schlaukopf/ sms/ ssd Table.odt Билеты/ The same problem exists in the kate panel
But what is the problem? Why should Cyrillic letters go after not Latin ones? Why not before them? Why not intermixed according to the sounds of the letters?
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3) > But what is the problem? Why should Cyrillic letters go after not Latin > ones? Why not before them? Why not intermixed according to the sounds of the > letters? Why "b" goes after "a"? Because the value of it is bigger. The same is with Cyrillic letters, they all have the values bigger than any Latin letter. So they must go after. When sorted, of course.
> Why "b" goes after "a"? Because the value of it is bigger. Yes, in the Latin alphabet. But there is no similar relationship between the Latin and Cyrillic alphabet. One is not "bigger" or "sequentially next" compared to the other one. Right? Or am I missing something? Also, please do not confirm your own bug. See https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/Issue_Reporting#Don.27t_confirm_your_own_issue
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #5) > > Why "b" goes after "a"? Because the value of it is bigger. > Yes, in the Latin alphabet. But there is no similar relationship between the > Latin and Cyrillic alphabet. One is not "bigger" or "sequentially next" > compared to the other one. Right? Or am I missing something? Yes, you are missing: https://unicode-table.com/ There IS the sequence of all alphabets. > Also, please do not confirm your own bug. See > https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/Issue_Reporting#Don. > 27t_confirm_your_own_issue Sorry.
I see, thank you.
Operating System: Slackware-current KDE Plasma Version: 5.21.5 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.82.0 Qt Version: 5.15.2 Kernel Version: 5.10.39 OS Type: 64-bit Graphics Platform: X11 Processors: 12 × Intel® Core™ i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz Memory: 31.1 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: Mesa Intel® UHD Graphics 630