Bug 428000 - RKWard 0.7.2, R 4.0.2 giving Qt5Script.dll error
Summary: RKWard 0.7.2, R 4.0.2 giving Qt5Script.dll error
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: rkward
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Microsoft Windows Microsoft Windows
: NOR major
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: RKWard Team
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2020-10-19 20:05 UTC by Aleata
Modified: 2020-10-20 06:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Aleata 2020-10-19 20:05:27 UTC
SUMMARY
After downloading the newest version of R 4.0.3 and RKWard version 0.7.2 and trying to open RKWard, I now get an error saying that the Qt5Script.dll cannot be found, and RKWard will not start. I found that it is missing from the destination folder.  When I reinstalled RKWard version 0.7.1b, I see Qt5Script.dll in the destination folder and RKWard opens normally. Is there some fix to this or do I need to download some other program?

STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. 
2. 
3. 

OBSERVED RESULT


EXPECTED RESULT


SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows: 10
macOS: 
Linux/KDE Plasma: 
(available in About System)
KDE Plasma Version: 
KDE Frameworks Version: 
Qt Version: 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Comment 1 Thomas Friedrichsmeier 2020-10-19 20:44:38 UTC
Sorry for letting something this obvious slip past my (obviously sloppy) testing. I must have installed over a previous version, without uninstalling, first.

The quick fix will be to use the following installer, instead: https://binary-factory.kde.org/job/RKWard_Nightly_mingw64/495/artifact/rkward-master-495-windows-mingw_64-gcc.exe
Comment 2 Aleata 2020-10-19 20:58:38 UTC
Thank you so much for this fix.  It is working well so far.
Comment 3 Thomas Friedrichsmeier 2020-10-20 06:11:15 UTC
Thanks again for reporting!

This installer is now available as the "official" rkward-0.7.2-1-R-4.0.2.exe from download.kde.org.

This may not be the final solution (it means we're using qtwebkit in place of qwebengine a little while longe), but should be good for the time being. Closing this ticket.