Bug 426662 - File naming - extension aware does not work?
Summary: File naming - extension aware does not work?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: AdvancedRename-file (show other bugs)
Version: 7.1.0
Platform: Other Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2020-09-18 01:05 UTC by Rob Brown
Modified: 2022-01-31 21:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 7.5.0
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rob Brown 2020-09-18 01:05:37 UTC
SUMMARY
My expectation of 'extension aware' file numbering would be that when selected, if I have a RAW and JPEG pair of files, each file would get the same numeric sequence.

When I check this option, instead each file is given a new number.

Is this the expected result?


STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. Select a number of images. Go to Item >> rename
2. Enter the format of name in my case I started with a date, then wanted to put a number after it
3. Press Number...
4. Select Extension Aware Naming, press OK
5. The format of the name for batch looks something like: [date:"yyyyMMdd_"]###[e]   .... where the [e} is supposed to represent extension aware.

OBSERVED RESULT
A pair of RAW+JPEG (same image, different file type) has a DIFFERENT unique name. e.g. 
20200810_012.RAF
20200810_013.JPG

EXPECTED RESULT
Files of same image, different type should be like this:
20200810_012.RAF
20200810_012.JPG


SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Linux: 7.1.0 Flatpak (ubuntu)


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Comment 1 Rob Brown 2020-09-18 01:06:22 UTC
Related to https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246938 ?
Comment 2 Maik Qualmann 2020-09-18 05:51:50 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 398377 ***
Comment 3 Maik Qualmann 2021-11-12 21:33:57 UTC
The [e] parameter works under digiKam-7.4.0 as it is desired with your example. I cannot reproduce a problem, we know that there are many problems with the Flatpak due to the sandbox.

Maik
Comment 4 caulier.gilles 2021-12-15 20:56:45 UTC
Fixed with #398377