Created attachment 128580 [details] Screenshot showing dock above active window SUMMARY This is tricky for me to pin down and reliably reproduce, but happens often. I have a centered dock at the bottom edge in dodge-active mode, which starts out small but can expand up to 80% of the screen width. I usually keep a narrow Telegram Desktop window at the left edge of the screen. In the dock's smallest state, there is no overlap, it has a Virtual Desktop Bar plasmoid and the Task Manager plasmoid (not latte's), and widens when I open enough windows. When wide enough, sometimes it will overlap the Telegram Desktop window, even when that window is active, though sometimes it will not. I don't know what constitutes the different conditions here. STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Create dock (bottom; center; dodge active; items: relative-4.5%; zoom 0%; max length 80%; BG size 100%; BG opacity 60%) 2. Add Virtual Desktop Bar and Task Manager 3. Keep narrow (Telegram Desktop?) window at left 4. Open enough windows to widen the dock to overlap Again, this does not always reproduce. I'm happy to receive any testing suggestions. OBSERVED RESULT The dock shows above the active window on the left. EXPECTED RESULT The dock hides if showing would overlap any active window. SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Linux/KDE Plasma: Arch Linux KDE Plasma Version: 5.18.5 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.70.0 Qt Version: 5.14.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION I'm attaching a screenshot of the behavior, and shortly I'll redact some latte configs and upload them.
Created attachment 128581 [details] main latte config, though it's mostly klipper junk
There is a chance that Latte has fixed this for git version.. All metrics have been updated vastly... You need to check it out with git version.
Created attachment 128582 [details] redacted latte layout file
(In reply to Michail Vourlakos from comment #2) > There is a chance that Latte has fixed this for git version.. All metrics > have been updated vastly... You need to check it out with git version. Alright, I'm running r4190.cb368c50 now, and will monitor behavior for a few days. Thanks.
I don't know if this will affect testing of this issue, but FYI in this version, the maximum length limit seems to be ignored by that dock.
(In reply to andydecleyre from comment #5) > I don't know if this will affect testing of this issue, but FYI in this > version, the maximum length limit seems to be ignored by that dock. no idea what you are talking about. Open a proper bug report for this. Maximum Length in never ignored.
So far, so good. I'll close. Thanks!