Since last update the third column of the application window (detail) has no content, but error message "Plugin library 'kde_grantlee_plugin' not found" (twice). I have both kaddressbook (19.08.1-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build37) and libkf5kaddressbookgrantlee5 (19.08.1-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build36) packages installed from KDE Neon repos. Do I need to install/setup anything else? System info: - KDE neon 5.16 - KDE Frameworks 5.62.0 - Qt 5.12.3
Is this still happening with latest neon?
Perhaps related (perhaps not). I see this message from Kontact, built from master: Error loading plugin: "The shared library was not found." org.kde.kcoreaddons: Expected a KPluginFactory, got a Grantlee::ScriptableTagLibrary I don't know if it comes from KAddressbook specifically, or some other Kontact plugin.
(In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #1) > Is this still happening with latest neon? Oh yeah, it is still there. KDE Frameworks 5.63.0 Qt 5.13.1
'Since last update the third column of the application window ' what application?
(In reply to Jonathan Riddell from comment #4) > what application? The Kaddressbook application obviously, as I set the Product field right initially. Dunno, why cfeck messed it with Neon, thanks for pointing me out. It is kaddressbook 19.08.3-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build43 actually.
The 'grantlee' notification came with today's update and appears in akregator and kaddressbook and it may also be the cause of why I now can't read my email. OS: Arch Linux KDE Plasma 5.17.4 Frameworks 5.65.0 Qt 5.13.2
Now works correctly after new Grantlee update. Thanks KDE community OS: Arch Linux KDE Plasma 5.17.4 Frameworks 5.65.0 Qt 5.13.2
Still valid in KDE Neon. Definitely not Arch Linux specific.
The ArchLinux issue was a packaging problem which has nothing to do with this.
(In reply to Antonio Rojas from comment #9) > The ArchLinux issue was a packaging problem which has nothing to do with > this. Thanks
What's the output of `apt policy libkf5grantleetheme-plugins` on neon? And who confirmed this bug? As far as I can tell this could still be a packaging issue on neon as well, specifically one could uninstall the plugin manually as it is only a recommended not required dependency. Should it be required?
Hello Harald! Output of `apt policy libkf5grantleetheme-plugins` is: libkf5grantleetheme-plugins: Instalovaná verze: (žádná) Kandidát: 19.12.0-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build26 Tabulka verzí: 19.12.0-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build26 500 500 http://archive.neon.kde.org/user bionic/main amd64 Packages 19.08.3-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build25 500 500 http://archive.neon.kde.org/user bionic/main amd64 Packages 19.08.3-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build24 500 500 http://archive.neon.kde.org/user bionic/main amd64 Packages 19.08.3-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build23 500 500 http://archive.neon.kde.org/user bionic/main amd64 Packages 19.08.2-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build22 500 500 http://archive.neon.kde.org/user bionic/main amd64 Packages 19.08.0-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build20 500 500 http://archive.neon.kde.org/user bionic/main amd64 Packages 19.04.3-0xneon+18.04+bionic+build19 500 500 http://archive.neon.kde.org/user bionic/main amd64 Packages 17.12.3-0ubuntu1 500 500 http://cz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages Since the package libkf5grantleetheme-plugins is manually installed, Kaddressbook works perfectly. Thus I believe the package should be set as a required dependency.
Sandro, what's your thinking on this? In debian the only relationship chain is kaddressbook -> depends libkf5grantleetheme5 -> recommends libkf5grantleetheme-plugins and as a result a user could uninstall the plugins when that seems entirely disadvantageous.