SUMMARY STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. export a photo with a title to google photo 2. go to google photo 3. display the photo, display data of the photo OBSERVED RESULT there is no text anywhere corresponding to "title" EXPECTED RESULT there is a text corresponding to "title" SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Windows: macOS: Linux/KDE Plasma: (available in About System) KDE Plasma Version: 5.15.3 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.56.0 Qt Version: 5.12.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
It's reproducible with 6.1.0 pre-release AppImage bundle ? https://files.kde.org/digikam/ Gilles Caulier
As you can see here Google uses the description as title. So you have to set a description, this is displayed correctly. Yes, the new Google Photo API has its own features. Of course we could mix with strings or pass the title instead of the description, but how do other users see it? https://developers.google.com/photos/library/reference/rest/v1/mediaItems Maik
If I upload the photo with title and description via the web browser Google also uses only the description. The result is therefore identical. Maik
Why I did this bug report? Because till 5.9 "title" and "captions" in digiKam were joint together and put in google photo in "description".
Philippe, Google changes the behavior of remote webservice and we have no control with it. I"m bot sure if we can do something in digiKam about this regression. Gilles Caulier
Git commit 86517c1d460c92154bebf93f4c9cf9da2cad5d33 by Maik Qualmann. Committed on 31/03/2019 at 08:42. Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'. various fixes for Google Photos service FIXED-IN: 6.1.0 M +2 -1 NEWS M +5 -5 core/dplugins/generic/webservices/google/gsnewalbumdlg.cpp M +1 -1 core/dplugins/generic/webservices/google/gswidget.cpp M +40 -133 core/dplugins/generic/webservices/google/gswindow.cpp M +0 -3 core/dplugins/generic/webservices/google/gswindow.h https://commits.kde.org/digikam/86517c1d460c92154bebf93f4c9cf9da2cad5d33
Hello i search the meaning of "title" and "caption" "title" is a reference about picture. it's a data for the photographer workflow. it may be a number or a text. i's not a description of what we can see in the picture. "caption" is a comment about what we can see in the picture. it's for the person who view the picture in an album. So it is non sense to joint "title" and "caption" to built a comment about what we see in the picture. the problem is : for 10 years (?) digikam joint the 2 items erroneously to make a comment !