In the baseline simulator, jumps to guest code addresses that are not known at
JIT time have to be looked up in a guest->host mapping table.  That means:
indirect branches, indirect calls and most commonly, returns.  Since there are
huge numbers of these (often 10+ million/second) the mapping mechanism needs
to be extremely cheap.

Currently, this is implemented using a direct-mapped cache, VG_(tt_fast), with
2^15 (guest_addr, host_addr) pairs.  This is queried in handwritten assembly
in VG_(disp_cp_xindir) in dispatch-<arch>-<os>.S.  If there is a miss in the
cache then we fall back out to C land, and do a slow lookup using
VG_(search_transtab).

Given that the size of the translation table(s) in recent years have expanded
significantly in order to keep pace with increasing applicatin sizes, two bad
things have happened: (1) the cost of a miss in the fast cache has risen
significantly, and (2) the miss rate on the fast cache has also increased
significantly.  This means that large (~ one-million-basic-blocks-JITted)
applications that run for a long time end up spending a lot of time in
VG_(search_transtab).

The proposed fix is to increase associativity of the fast cache, from 1
(direct mapped) to 4.  Simulations of various cache configurations using
indirect-branch traces from a large application show that is the best of
various configurations.  In an extreme case with 5.7 billion indirect
branches:

* The increase of associativity from 1 way to 4 way, whilst keeping the
  overall cache size the same (32k guest/host pairs), reduces the miss rate by
  around a factor of 3, from 4.02% to 1.30%.

* The use of a slightly better hash function than merely slicing off the
  bottom 15 bits of the address, reduces the miss rate further, from 1.30% to
  0.53%.

Overall the VG_(tt_fast) miss rate is almost unchanged on small workloads, but
reduced by a factor of up to almost 8 on large workloads.

By implementing each (4-entry) cache set using a move-to-front scheme in the
case of hits in ways 1, 2 or 3, the vast majority of hits can be made to
happen in way 0.  Hence the cost of having this extra associativity is almost
zero in the case of a hit.  The improved hash function costs an extra 2 ALU
shots (a shift and an xor) but overall this seems performance neutral to a
win.