SUMMARY Using Falkon normally, the AdBlock extension behavior in general makes no sense, having, for example, to specify a lot of times that i don't wanna have it disabled for DuckDuckGo. STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Open Falkon. 2. Make a search on DuckDuckGo with AdBlock activated. 3. See the ads. 4. Go to the extension basic config with a single click on the AdBlock icon to check the checkbox of disabling is checked. OBSERVED RESULT The checkbox is checked even if i unchecked before. EXPECTED RESULT The checkbox should be unchecked. SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Windows: MacOS: Linux/KDE Plasma: Linux 4.19.4 (available in About System) KDE Plasma Version: Plasma 5.14.4 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.52 Qt Version: 5.11.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
You the AdBlock behavior in general makes no sense, but the only example is for DuckDuckGo. The code for this is here: <https://phabricator.kde.org/source/falkon/browse/master/src/lib/adblock/adblocksubscription.cpp$294>. It says DuckDuckGo ad whitelist rules They cannot be removed, but can be disabled. Please consider not disabling them. Thanks!
The embedded adblock must be a REALLY old version since there isnt the ability to right click on an ad or image to block it, plus it doesnt make ANY sense to load ALL the lists that were added to block when we go to the options' screen. NO Adblocker EVER does that. Also, several ads are blocked but the spaces arent removed as they should be.
(In reply to Felipe from comment #2) > The embedded adblock must be a REALLY old version since there isnt the > ability to right click on an ad or image to block it, plus it doesnt make > ANY sense to load ALL the lists that were added to block when we go to the > options' screen. NO Adblocker EVER does that. Also, several ads are blocked > but the spaces arent removed as they should be. Totally agree. That's one of the worst things of Falkon for me. I'm expecting a new version of the software and hoping some of the bugs/issues will be fixed, cause if i want it as my daily and default web browser, the AdBlock must work perfectly fine, or at least don't make me mad. I read before that at GSOC a mate was working on the JS add-ons compatibility, i don't know if Chromium or Firefox or what, but it would be nice, i would love to can use the Mozilla add-ons repository, but since it uses QtWebEngine, and that's Chromium, i suppose that would be Chromium extensions, but anyway, that would be better to improve the amount of add-ons that can be used on it, like uBlock Origin, the best one for me in this category.
This is all offtopic. As Alexander Browne mentioned, you can disable those rules if you really don't want them. And AdBlock extension is not "outdated" in Falkon, it is custom implementation so the version number has *nothing* in common with versions of Firefox/Chrome/... extensions.
(In reply to David Rosca from comment #4) > This is all offtopic. > > As Alexander Browne mentioned, you can disable those rules if you really > don't want them. > > And AdBlock extension is not "outdated" in Falkon, it is custom > implementation so the version number has *nothing* in common with versions > of Firefox/Chrome/... extensions. I see. Sorry about that. I'll check it out then.