Bug 391697 - Ark does not invoke cursor status
Summary: Ark does not invoke cursor status
Status: RESOLVED NOT A BUG
Alias: None
Product: ark
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 17.12.2
Platform: Gentoo Packages Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Elvis Angelaccio
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-03-11 04:17 UTC by Zakhar
Modified: 2018-04-08 21:48 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Zakhar 2018-03-11 04:17:38 UTC
Steps to reproduce:
-Add archive which more than 30 seconds to extract
-Right click from dolphin on archive and select "extract here"

Results: Notice cursor no longer jumpts (if default cursor style is left enabled) what happens is it no longer lets user know archive is currently being extracted.
Comment 1 Elvis Angelaccio 2018-03-11 09:14:12 UTC
When you extract from dolphin, the cursor is handled by dolphin. I think the current behavior is correct: the extraction is being performed by an external ark process, not by dolphin. So I don't think that dolphin should show the busy cursor. We show the extraction progress in the systemtray notification applet and that's how you can track when the extraction finishes.
Comment 2 Zakhar 2018-03-15 04:59:27 UTC
Would be nice to have some sort of progess bar in its own dialog window, currently only notifications area has progress bar available
Comment 3 Elvis Angelaccio 2018-03-15 20:16:45 UTC
(In reply to Zakhar from comment #2)
> Would be nice to have some sort of progess bar in its own dialog window,
> currently only notifications area has progress bar available

Hmm, actually there should be also the progress bar in the task manager entry, but somehow that's not working.
Comment 4 Zakhar 2018-03-16 06:30:52 UTC
Task bar has a "highlighted" progress bar in which a cover is overlaid at some transparency level never the less it is a broken feature. Should task manager indicator be working, I would still insist for progress bar dialog because it is the natural and most common implementation for such an operation.
Comment 5 Elvis Angelaccio 2018-03-18 10:03:15 UTC
(In reply to Zakhar from comment #4)
> I would still insist for progress bar dialog
> because it is the natural and most common implementation for such an
> operation.

Then please open a feature request against the frameworks-kio product, which is what handles the progress of jobs.
Comment 6 Zakhar 2018-03-18 23:30:35 UTC
Filed 391361
Comment 7 Zakhar 2018-04-08 21:48:07 UTC
Resolved cause it belongs to frameworks-kio