Bug 38878 - kmail redefine keys ignored
Summary: kmail redefine keys ignored
Status: RESOLVED WAITINGFORINFO
Alias: None
Product: kmail
Classification: Applications
Component: keys and menus (show other bugs)
Version: 1.3.99
Platform: Compiled Sources Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-03-02 09:18 UTC by mail
Modified: 2012-08-19 01:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description mail 2002-03-02 09:10:58 UTC
(*** This bug was imported into bugs.kde.org ***)

Package:           kmail
Version:           1.3.99 (using KDE 2.9.0 3 (CVS >= 20020213))
Severity:          normal
Installed from:    compiled sources
Compiler:          gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.4.16-64GB-SMP
OS/Compiler notes: 

I've redefined the next and previous keys to be down and up arrow but they only move the message up and down and not the position in the messages list.

(Submitted via bugs.kde.org)
(Called from KBugReport dialog)
Comment 1 Ingo Kl 2002-03-02 11:27:38 UTC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 02 March 2002 10:10 mail@diddyland.com wrote:
> I've redefined the next and previous keys to be down and up arrow
> but they only move the message up and down and not the position in
> the messages list.

Those keys are currently hard-coded and therefore can't be changed. I=20
change your bug report to a wish list item.

Regards
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8gLctGnR+RTDgudgRAn8uAJ9dHVpA/C/TjK7NBbfEE4Z0seFGgACgmAV4
gSGmETcj4iMzK+R+1OA5r50=3D
=3DiYN0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment 2 Myriam Schweingruber 2012-08-18 08:38:45 UTC
Thank you for your feature request. Kmail1 is currently unmaintained so we are closing all wishes. Please feel free to reopen a feature request for Kmail2 if it has not already been implemented.
Thank you for your understanding.
Comment 3 Luigi Toscano 2012-08-19 01:10:46 UTC
Instead of creating a new feature request, please confirm here if the wishlist is still valid for kmail2.