Bug 386839 - High memory utilization for plasmshell
Summary: High memory utilization for plasmshell
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 386844
Alias: None
Product: plasmashell
Classification: Plasma
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 5.11.3
Platform: Neon Linux
: NOR major
Target Milestone: 1.0
Assignee: David Edmundson
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-11-13 06:15 UTC by Kedar
Modified: 2017-11-14 01:34 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
memory utilization by plasmashell (113.80 KB, image/png)
2017-11-13 06:15 UTC, Kedar 		Details
QT version and sys info (62.59 KB, image/png)
2017-11-13 10:56 UTC, Kedar 		Details
View All Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kedar 2017-11-13 06:15:44 UTC 
Created attachment 108828 [details]
memory utilization by plasmashell

Hey

Today, after an update, (13th November), I found the memory utilization of the plasmashell is about 2 GB. It was never the case before. I am running a KDE Neon 5.11.3 and is fully updated.

I am not running any custom packages etc. Attached is the screenshot. Let me know if you need any trace etc and the commands to run the same. Will be happy to share the details. Right now the desktop has become un-usable as it has become quite slow.

Cheers 
Kedar
Comment 1 David Edmundson 2017-11-13 09:01:25 UTC 
What Qt version?
Do you happen to have a slideshow wallpaper
Comment 2 Kedar 2017-11-13 10:56:36 UTC 
Created attachment 108834 [details]
QT version and sys info

I have added the screenshot for the sysinfo

I have three 22inch (1080p) monitors all running picture of the day as desktop background
Comment 3 David Edmundson 2017-11-13 11:13:46 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 386844 ***
Comment 4 Kedar 2017-11-14 01:34:54 UTC 
Issue seems to have fixed. Looks like openshot was the culprit. I uninstalled it  and gave the machine a restart and since then it is working as usual.

I also changed from the onboard display card to ATI / Radeon display card. The performance has since improved dramatically. Can see that the displays don't lag any more. I guess it was more of a display card issue for me.

Cheers