Sorry for opening so many bugs. I promise this will be the last one that is not a real bug but wishlist material :) When you are editing a single track, it should be possible to jumping to next cut in current track only, instead of the next relevant point with alt + arrows Rationale is that might have a track full of clips, and you are editing another non related track and it makes you move very slowly Possible solutions: - mark which tracks should be considered as relevant points - shortcut to toogle all/current track navigation - use a different shortcut
I think it could be a good enhancement too. Maybe only jump on active tracks?
In fact this has been implemented since 20.04. We now only seek to snap points on the active tracks. By default all tracks are active but you can make a track inactive by clicking on it's tag (V1,A2,..) or using shortcuts. Please test and let us know if it works for you.
Just tested it on Windows on 20.04.01 and it does not work - still snaps to key points on all tracks.
Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 days. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and set the bug status as REPORTED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDSINFO status with no change in 30 days the bug will be closed as RESOLVED > WORKSFORME due to lack of needed information. For more information about our bug triaging procedures please read the wiki located here: https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as REPORTED so that the KDE team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
Didn't know i need to change the status - no I do)
Created attachment 136653 [details] jump cut example
(In reply to ivangretsky from comment #3) > Just tested it on Windows on 20.04.01 and it does not work - still snaps to > key points on all tracks. This is implemented, see attachment on how to use.
(In reply to farid from comment #7) > This is implemented, see attachment on how to use. Just tested it out and it works great! Thank you!