Hi ! The option "show in timeline" for layers should inherit the value of their parents (if they have one). Let's say I have this structure : -Group01 [X] Show in timeline --layer 1 [ ] Show in timeline --layer 2 [X] Show in timeline Now if I uncheck "Show in timeline" for Group01, layer 1 and layer 2 should be hidden from timeline too. Of course, if I check Group01 again, they should return to their previous state.
So they should only inherit the disabled state but not the enabled state? (Only not-checked checkbox)
It sounds like the feature request is to have a "toggle all". Maybe if we do this for group layers, we need a better name for it like "Show all in timeline"
I think that Gordie wants (wanted?) the 'disabled' state to be inherited by all group members, including subgroups; but the 'enabled' state to be a 'use local settings' function. i.e. a master turn-off switch but not a master turn-on switch. I can see how this would be useful from a logical/technical point of view but it does have the possibility for massive confusion with nested multi-layer groups. A turn on/off switch that is applied to all members of the group, including subgroups would be less flexible but still useful and with less possibility of confusion.
Hi Looking this request, if i understand, it won't be possible anymore to get a layer visible in timeline if parent group is not in timeline? Currently I have this kind of configuration: -Group00 [ ] Show in timeline --Group01 [ ] Show in timeline ---layer 1 [ ] Show in timeline ---layer 2 [X] Show in timeline I want layer 'layer 2' in timeline but I don't want groups being visible in timeline (I don't have enough space to display rows that I don't need in timeline) From my point of view, doing something like this might more a regression than an improvement :-/ I understand the idea of being able to switch on/off groups of layer in timeline, can be interested by this too, but not in this way... Grum999