can you add the following entries: - width - height I know image size is available but for sorting width/height would be more usefull. at my installation the orientation entry didn't work
It's easy enough to add these as view options, since the information is already available. The question is... do we want to? Is this niche use case worth cluttering the menu up with two additional options that duplicate more general functionality that's already available?
Yeah, I think it's worth it. The additional information columns are pretty well hidden, and anyone who goes poking around in there probably knows what they're doing and wants lots of extra information.
Git commit 1441fefc07f126c1c9eddc3e9f1babff8b762b28 by Nathaniel Graham, on behalf of Julian Schraner. Committed on 01/04/2018 at 17:27. Pushed by ngraham into branch 'master'. Split Image Size into Width/Height Summary: This patch splits the single property "Image Size" into "Width" and "Height", providing more fine-tuned control for power users. Test Plan: - Sorting works correctly - No real change, only exposed differently Reviewers: #dolphin, elvisangelaccio, ngraham Reviewed By: #dolphin, elvisangelaccio, ngraham Subscribers: ngraham, elvisangelaccio Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D11816 M +6 -11 src/kitemviews/kfileitemmodel.cpp M +1 -1 src/kitemviews/kfileitemmodel.h M +4 -24 src/kitemviews/private/kbaloorolesprovider.cpp M +1 -1 src/panels/places/placesitemmodel.cpp https://commits.kde.org/dolphin/1441fefc07f126c1c9eddc3e9f1babff8b762b28