I just installed DigiKam 5.3.0 on Ubuntu 16.10. and copied my folders from my old computer (let DigiKam make a new db). Some pics don't show up in the the thumbnail view. The count is correct in the albums tree, but only some or none show up in the thumbnail view, they all show up in the Table view. A quick sampling suggests any jpg files > 2MB are not showing up. "Thumbnail generation fails on large files" says to change "kcontrol->kde components->file manager->Previes & Metadata (tab)->Maximum file size", but I don't have that on Ubuntu!
Are thumbnails displayed after reloading (F5)? Maik
>"Thumbnail generation fails on large files" says to change "kcontrol->kde >components->file manager->Previes & Metadata (tab)->Maximum file size" digiKam is fully independent of KDE here. In fact digiKam become more and more KDE free since 5.x release, especially about the settings. Can you imagine that we can release DK without to try to see if JPEG fiel size > 2MB are supported well in thumbnail view. It's ridiculous. So, i suspect a huge packaging problem here. Please try with digiKam AppImage bundle instead Kubuntu package. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM Gilles Caulier Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 102347 [details] attachment-16539-0.html No, I have not been able to get thumbnails to show up at all in the the thumbnail view for those files. Thumbnails to show up on table view. On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Maik Qualmann <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------------- > CC| |metzpinguin@gmail.com > > --- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> --- > Are thumbnails displayed after reloading (F5)? > > Maik > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
Rick, I'm not sure to understand your previous comment. Do mean that thumbnail are show properly in icon-view and not in table-view, or the inverse ? Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 102348 [details] attachment-598-0.html I still get the same results using the digikam-5.4.0-01-x86-64 appimage. I never used an appimage before! that was pretty simple, pretty nice and I like it! Also it is not a 2MB size. I just was looking some more and there are larger files with thumbs showing up. It was just that the first dir I checked had only 2 out of 13 that showed and those 2 were less that 2MB, the next dir I checked had like 103 and only showed 15 and when I sorted it by size, there were 15 files less than 2MB. Then I tried to make one that show and one that doesn't smaller, so I could put them in my report question, but they both show up after converting them to a smaller size using the batch resize to make them tiny. It must be something in the header. The F5 does show doing thumbs but they still don't show up. Maybe related... in the thumbs view, any pics i see (have thumbs) the EXIF info changes when I click on them, in the table view it's flaky, I click on a different album in the tree, then click back and click a pic, then I can cursor up and down and exif data shows and changes, but as soon as I click a pic, exif data goes away, keyboard cursor up and down does not bring it back. On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:41 AM, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > caulier.gilles@gmail.com changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------------- > CC| |caulier.gilles@gmail.com > > --- Comment #2 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > >"Thumbnail generation fails on large files" says to change "kcontrol->kde > >components->file manager->Previes & Metadata (tab)->Maximum file size" > > digiKam is fully independent of KDE here. In fact digiKam become more and > more > KDE free since 5.x release, especially about the settings. > > Can you imagine that we can release DK without to try to see if JPEG fiel > size > > 2MB are supported well in thumbnail view. It's ridiculous. > > So, i suspect a huge packaging problem here. Please try with digiKam > AppImage > bundle instead Kubuntu package. > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM > > Gilles Caulier > > > > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
Created attachment 102349 [details] attachment-723-0.html Everything always shows up in the tableview, (except sometimes EXIF info) but many pics do not show up in the thumbnails view. On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 4:02 PM, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > --- Comment #4 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > Rick, > > I'm not sure to understand your previous comment. > > Do mean that thumbnail are show properly in icon-view and not in > table-view, or > the inverse ? > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
Can you give the full trace of debug statements printed in the console when you run AppImage, especially when album contents must be show in icon view ? Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 102350 [details] attachment-1244-0.html i don't know how to run an appimage from terminal. I just clicked it in nautilus On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 4:41 PM, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > --- Comment #7 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > Can you give the full trace of debug statements printed in the console > when you > run AppImage, especially when album contents must be show in icon view ? > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
open a terminal, go to directory where AppImage file is (use "cd" CLI command), and to run it just use "./file_name" Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 102352 [details] attachment-1929-0.html I think this must be the relevant info, it is from an F5 on a directory where 2 out of 11 pics show up in the thumbnail view. Or ah well I thought I saw some errors in there and I don't see them now! either way this is what comes out when I do an f5 digikam.general: Using 8 CPU core to run threads digikam.general: Action Thread run 11 new jobs digikam.general: scan mode: ScheduleCollectionScan :: ("/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/") digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_31_00.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_32_00-2.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_32_00-1_v1.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_32_00-3.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_31_00-1.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_30_00.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_29_00.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_33_00-1.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through DBUS digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_31_00-3_v1.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.geoiface: ---- digikam.general: Using 8 CPU core to run threads digikam.general: One job is done digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.general: Action Thread run 1 new jobs digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.general: One job is done digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_29_00-2.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.general: One job is done digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_33_00.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.geoiface: ---- digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.general: One job is done digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread digikam.general: One job is done digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_31_00-3_v1.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.general: One job is done digikam.general: One job is done digikam.general: One job is done digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_29_00-2.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.general: One job is done digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.general: One job is done digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 digikam.general: One job is done digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/2016_08_17_18_33_00.jpg" : JPEG file identified digikam.general: One job is done digikam.general: List of Pending Jobs is empty digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through DBUS digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 4:55 PM, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > --- Comment #9 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > open a terminal, go to directory where AppImage file is (use "cd" CLI > command), > and to run it just use "./file_name" > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
Created attachment 102353 [details] DK54 startup.txt attached is the complete output, from startup. started up in in thumbnail view of the album with 11 pics, 2 showing, clicked on the table view where all 11 pics show up, then an F5 On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Rick Hallock <rick@hallocks.us> wrote: > I think this must be the relevant info, it is from an F5 on a directory > where 2 out of 11 pics show up in the thumbnail view. > Or ah well I thought I saw some errors in there and I don't see them now! > either way this is what comes out when I do an f5 > > digikam.general: Using 8 CPU core to run threads > digikam.general: Action Thread run 11 new jobs > digikam.general: scan mode: ScheduleCollectionScan :: > ("/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl puppy/") > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_31_00.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_32_00-2.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_32_00-1_v1.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_32_00-3.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_31_00-1.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_30_00.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_29_00.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_33_00-1.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through DBUS > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_31_00-3_v1.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.geoiface: ---- > digikam.general: Using 8 CPU core to run threads > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.general: Action Thread run 1 new jobs > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_29_00-2.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_33_00.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.geoiface: ---- > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_31_00-3_v1.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_29_00-2.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.dimg: "/media/rick/Pictures/years/2016/2016-08-17 Big Girl > puppy/2016_08_17_18_33_00.jpg" : JPEG file identified > digikam.general: One job is done > digikam.general: List of Pending Jobs is empty > digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through DBUS > digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread > digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 4:55 PM, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > >> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 >> >> --- Comment #9 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- >> open a terminal, go to directory where AppImage file is (use "cd" CLI >> command), >> and to run it just use "./file_name" >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> -- >> You are receiving this mail because: >> You reported the bug. >> > > > > -- > > Thanks > Rick >
In your trace no error appear. So thumbnails are extracted as expected. The problem is not here... Do you have color management enabled ? Can you share some suspect files to try to reproduce the problem here ? Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 102365 [details] attachment-8253-0.html Not sure of color management. I can share a couple sample pics when I get home tonight. (8-9 hours from now) 1 at a time, to stay under 4meg size limit? On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:58 PM, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > --- Comment #12 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > In your trace no error appear. So thumbnails are extracted as expected. The > problem is not here... > > Do you have color management enabled ? > > Can you share some suspect files to try to reproduce the problem here ? > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
Color Management : look in Setup Dialog, into CM panel. To share samples, use a cloud service from Internet Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 102378 [details] attachment-3660-0.html Yes, Color management is enabled. (tried turning it off no difference) here are two pics one shows the thumbnail, one doesn't. The one that shows is same pic, just re-saved smaller. ThumbnailShows.jpg <http:///home/rick/Dropbox/Public/pics/ThumbnailShows.jpg> ThumbnailNoShows.jpg <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3343817/pics/ThumbnailNoShows.jpg> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:43 AM, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > --- Comment #14 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > Color Management : look in Setup Dialog, into CM panel. > > To share samples, use a cloud service from Internet > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
Rick No problem to show your dog picture with current digiKam 5.4.0 AppImage bundle. Just to be sure, Crete a new account on your computer, download last AppImage (just updated on GDrive https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM), and start it. Create a new empty collection and settings, and import your suspected pictures. Look if all is fine. Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 102387 [details] attachment-23915-0.html I need the x86-64 appimage On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:38 PM, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > --- Comment #16 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > Rick > > No problem to show your dog picture with current digiKam 5.4.0 AppImage > bundle. > > Just to be sure, Crete a new account on your computer, download last > AppImage > (just updated on GDrive > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM), and > start > it. Create a new empty collection and settings, and import your suspected > pictures. Look if all is fine. > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
the 64 bits AppImage is in the shared folder at this URL: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 102388 [details] attachment-25942-0.html I used a different Ubuntu user, ran the digikam-5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage, went through the install questions, created a new album, copied the two pics into the folder. and only one pic shows up in the thumbnail view. (off to work now) On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:17 AM, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > --- Comment #18 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > the 64 bits AppImage is in the shared folder at this URL: > > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
2 pictures ? I only get one picture from the cloud from you. Where is the second one ? Look links given in comment #15 : ThumbnailShows.jpg <http:///home/rick/Dropbox/Public/pics/ThumbnailShows.jpg> ThumbnailNoShows.jpg <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3343817/pics/ThumbnailNoShows.jpg> Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 102396 [details] attachment-12590-0.html It looks like I didn't make the link right for the ThumbnailShows <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3343817/pics/ThumbnailShows.jpg> but the ThumbnailNoShows <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3343817/pics/ThumbnailNoShows.jpg> link you sent back is right. What doesn't make sense is, if you got the ThumbnailNoShows, that is the one that the thumbnail does not show for me. On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:26 AM, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > --- Comment #20 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > 2 pictures ? > > I only get one picture from the cloud from you. Where is the second one ? > > Look links given in comment #15 : > > ThumbnailShows.jpg > <http:///home/rick/Dropbox/Public/pics/ThumbnailShows.jpg> > > ThumbnailNoShows.jpg > <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3343817/pics/ThumbnailNoShows.jpg> > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
Please enable this option for testing: Settings->Image Editor->Versioning->Always show original images Maik
Created attachment 102401 [details] attachment-26978-0.html That makes them show up! :) On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Maik Qualmann <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 > > --- Comment #22 from Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> --- > Please enable this option for testing: Settings->Image > Editor->Versioning->Always show original images > > Maik > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
Created attachment 102402 [details] attachment-27383-0.html Now anything else I can do to help? On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Rick Hallock <rick@hallocks.us> wrote: > That makes them show up! :) > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Maik Qualmann <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> > wrote: > >> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372684 >> >> --- Comment #22 from Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> --- >> Please enable this option for testing: Settings->Image >> Editor->Versioning->Always show original images >> >> Maik >> >> -- >> You are receiving this mail because: >> You reported the bug. >> > > > > -- > > Thanks > Rick >
No. This is the expected behavior of the Versioning options, as explained in Setup dialog. Gilles Caulier