Bug 368899 - .desktop starter containing cmdline won't be executed anymore
Summary: .desktop starter containing cmdline won't be executed anymore
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 366793
Alias: None
Product: frameworks-kio
Classification: Frameworks and Libraries
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Arch Linux Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Faure
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-09-16 13:17 UTC by Michael
Modified: 2016-09-24 20:51 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael 2016-09-16 13:17:29 UTC
I've a desktop starter which opens a ssh connection.
This did work before and suddenly it won't anymore.
Tested on my workstation and notebook (both Arch Linux)


here is the .desktop file:

[Desktop Entry]
Comment[de_DE]=
Comment=
Exec=ssh 192.168.1.123 -l foo
GenericName[de_DE]=
GenericName=
Icon=/home/foo/Bilder/icons/NAS.png
MimeType=
Name[de_DE]=NAS
Name=NAS
Path=/home/foo/
StartupNotify=true
Terminal=true
TerminalOptions=\s--noclose
Type=Application
X-DBUS-ServiceName=
X-DBUS-StartupType=
X-KDE-SubstituteUID=false
X-KDE-Username=











Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a new starter on desktop 
Enter a valid commandline. 
Set execute in terminal and keep window opened after program ended (in extended options)
2. Start the desktop shortcut from desktop
3.

Actual Results:  
nothing

Expected Results:  
open a terminal/konsole window and execute the commandline

journalctl -xe

klauncher[846]: -miniicon isn't supported anymore (service "NAS" )
Comment 1 InstallePatrick 2016-09-16 15:29:38 UTC
Same here with manjaro.
Comment 2 Kai Uwe Broulik 2016-09-17 12:30:17 UTC
Looks more like a desktop KIO and/or KRun issue, re-assigning.
Comment 3 Wolfgang Bauer 2016-09-24 16:58:58 UTC
Should be fixed by https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kio.git&a=commit&h=c784a879eaba0babc6274bc32e761772add3d4f8, I suppose.
Comment 4 Antonio Rojas 2016-09-24 18:47:58 UTC
No, this is actually bug 366793
Comment 5 Antonio Rojas 2016-09-24 18:48:29 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 366793 ***
Comment 6 Wolfgang Bauer 2016-09-24 20:51:37 UTC
(In reply to Antonio Rojas from comment #4)
> No, this is actually bug 366793

Ah yes, I overlooked the Exec line... ;-)